Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya No.746/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Sby Terkait Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah di Kota Surabaya

Authors

  • Dhaniar Eka Budiastanti Fakultas Hukum Universitas Merdeka Malang
  • Daniel Ananda Sebayang Fakultas Hukum Universitas Merdeka Malang

Keywords:

Breach of Contract, Binding Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB), Legal Certainty, Legal Protection

Abstract

The practice of breach of contract in a Binding Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) often leads to legal disputes that demonstrate a clash between legal certainty and the principle of utility. This research aims to analyze the inconsistency in the application of civil law norms in the Surabaya District Court Decision No. 746/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Sby, along with its juridical implications. This normative legal research employs a statutory approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. The collection of primary and secondary legal materials was conducted through library research, which were subsequently analyzed using a descriptive-analytical method. The results indicate that although the defendant was proven to have committed a breach of contract by failing to fulfill their obligations under the PPJB, the judge's considerations tended to emphasize the principle of utility to protect the bona fide purchaser, without providing proportional legal certainty for the plaintiff. The juridical implication of this decision is the emergence of obscure norms and weak legal certainty in the resolution of land PPJB disputes. The lack of synchronization between the Indonesian Civil Code and the Basic Agrarian Law causes ambiguity in the legal standing of the PPJB, thus potentially triggering new disputes in the future. Furthermore, legal protection for bona fide purchasers becomes suboptimal due to the absence of explicit regulations regarding the legal status of the PPJB and the limits of purchaser protection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adriansa, M. Z., Dewi, I. G. S., & Priyono, E. a. A. (2022). Kekuatan hukum perjanjian pengikatan jual beli tanah dibuat dibawah tangan. Progresif Jurnal Hukum, 16(2), 130–148. https://doi.org/10.33019/progresif.v16i2.3623

Amborowati, Y. (2020). Kekuatan hukum perjanjian terhadap perjanjian pengikatan jual beli hak atas tanah dan bangunan yang belum terdaftar. Ubaya Repository (University of Surabaya), 18(1), 302–319.

Ardika, G. T., & Ramli, R. (2019). Kekutan Hukum Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah (Studi Di Desa Babakan Kecamatan Sandubaya Kota Mataram). GANEC SWARA, 13(1), 172. https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v13i1.78

Firdaus, R. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pembeli Dalam Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah Yang Masih Berstatus Hak Pengelolaan. Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal, 2(1), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.32801/abc.v2i1.46

Hamonangan, A., Taufiqurrahman, M., & Pasaribu, R. M. (2021). Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (Ppjb) Dalam Transaksi Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Dan Atau Bangunan. JURNAL RECTUM Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, 3(2), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v3i2.1180

Inawati, I. (2023). Pembatalan akta perjanjian pengikatan jual beli tanah. Recital Review, 5(1), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v5i1.23047

Indonesia, B. P. N. M., & Supriyadi, S. (2017). Kedudukan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pertanahan. Arena Hukum, 10(2), 204–226. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2017.01002.3

Indonesia, F. H. U. I., & Rustam, R. (2021). Autentikasi Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah Yang Antidatir. Arena Hukum, 14(1), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01401.7

Pohan, R. H. A., Pujiwati, Y., & Saleh, K. A. (2023). Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya No. 746/Pdt.G/2021/Pn.Sby Tentang Pelanggaran Asas Itikad Baik Dalam Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah di Kota Surabaya Dikaitkan Dengan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. COMSERVA Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(09), 1661–1676. https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v2i09.564

Saputra, A. (2021). Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian pembuatan Akta Kuasa Menjual dalam perjanjian pengikatan jual beli tanah. Jurnal Officium Notarium, 1(3), 492–499. https://doi.org/10.20885/jon.vol1.iss3.art9

Utama, P. a. B., Sumardika, I. N., & Astiti, N. G. K. S. (2021). Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Hak atas Tanah sebagai Dasar Pembuatan Akta Jual Beli Dihadapan PPAT. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 2(1), 177–181. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.2.1.3064.177-181

Wahyuni, S., Madiong, B., & Makkawaru, Z. (2021). Analisis Wewenang Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Hak Milik Atas Tanah Di Kota Makassar. Jurnal Paradigma Administrasi Negara, 3(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.35965/jpan.v3i2.675

Winarno, J. (2017). Kajian Normatif Tentang Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata). Jurnal Independent, 5(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v5i1.62

Wulandari, A. a. D. (2019). Tanggung jawab notaris akibat batalnya akta perjanjian pengikatan jual beli tanah karena cacat hukum. Acta Comitas, 3(3), 436. https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2018.v03.i03.p04

Downloads

Published

2026-06-10

How to Cite

Budiastanti, D. E., & Daniel Ananda Sebayang. (2026). Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya No.746/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Sby Terkait Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah di Kota Surabaya. Bhirawa Law Journal, 7(1), 42–56. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unmer.ac.id/index.php/blj/article/view/17189

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.