Dari Struktur Birokrasi Tradisional ke Model Adhocracy (Struktur Organisasi Inovatif)
Abstract
The large bureaucratic structure will cause a range of negative consequences, comprehensive changes required. Adhocracy is one option from the many models of re-bureaucratic structure. This model is seen as an antithesis of bureaucracy that is outside the formal bureaucratic structure. Adhocracy is also referred to as the modern organization structure, innovative organization that can adapt to the changing environment. The purpose of this research seeks to contribute its knowledge by exploring a variety of secondary data, multiply a couple arguing about the concept and the form of adhocracy in bureaucracy. Meta-theory is used as a research method, data reduction in deductive to draw conclusions. The results of this study reveal adhocracy needed in bureaucracy, bureaucratic structure changes are objective needs in the last decade to get a performance of bureaucracy is more effective for delivering a quality of public services.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abouzeedan, A., & Hedner, T. (2012). Organization Structure Theories and Open Innovation Paradigm. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 9(1), 6-27. doi:10.1108/20425941211223598
Araujo, J. F., & Branco, J. F. (2009). Implementing Performance-Based Management in the Traditional Bureaucracy of Portugal. Public Administration, 87(3), 557-573. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01762.x
Argyriades, D. (2010). From Bureaucracy to Debureaucratization? Public Organiz Rev, 10(1), 275-297. doi:10.1007/s11115-010-0136-1
Baligh, H. H. (2006). Organization Structure: Theory and Design, Analysis and Prescription. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.
Barnett, E., & Thomas, J. (2009). Methods for the Synthesis of Qualitative Research: A Critical Review. National Centre for Research Methods Working Papers Series, (EPPI-)Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, London.
Bozeman, B. (2000). Bureaucracy and Red Tape. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Bozeman, B. (2004). All Organizations are Public: Comparing Public and Private Organizations. Washington D.C: Beard Books.
Caiden, G. E. (1991). What Really Is Public Maladministration? Public Administration Review, 51(6), 486-493.
Caiden, G. E. (2009). A Parabolic Theory of Bureaucracy or Max Weber Through the Looking Glass. In A. Farazman, Bureaucracy and Administration (p. 111). Florida: CRC Press.
Callahan, K. (2007). Elements of Effective Governance: Measurement, Accountability and Participation. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. A. (2011). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture (3rd ed.). San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Christensen, T., Laegreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Rovik, K. A. (2007). Organization Theory and The Public Sector: Instrument, Culture and Myth. Oxon: Routledge.
Cichocki, P., & Irwin, C. (2011). Organization Design A Guide to Building Effective Organizations. London: Kogan Page Limited.
Clegg, S. R. (1997). Modern Organizations: Organization Studies in The Postmodern Word. London: SAGE Publications.
Clegg, S. R. (2015). The End of Bureaucracy? Reinventing Hierarchy and Bureaucracy-from the Bureau to Network Organizations, 35, 59-84. doi:10.1108/S0733-558X(2012)0000035005
Daft, R. L. (2010). Organization Theory and Design (10th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
Denhardt, R. B., & Catlaw, T. J. (2015). Theories of Public Organization (7th ed.). Stamford: Cengage Learning.
Diefenbach, T., & Todnem, R. (2012). Bureaucracy and Hierarchy - What Else!? In T. Diefenbach, & R. Todnem, Research in the Sociology of Organizations Bureau to Network Organizations Volume 35 (pp. 1-27). Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Dixit, A. K. (2010). Democracy, Autocracy and Bureaucracy. Journal of Globalization and Development, 1(1), 1-45. doi:10.2202/1948-1837.1010
Dolan, T. E. (2010). Revisiting Adhocracy: From Rhetorical Revisionism to Smart Mobs. Journal of Futures Studies, 15(2), 33-50.
Du Gay, P. (2005). The Values Bureaucracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dwiyanto, A. (2015). Reformasi Birokrasi Kontekstual. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Farazman, A. (2002). Modern Organizations Theory and Practice (2nd ed.). Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Farazman, A. (2009). Bureaucracy and Administration. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Gailmard, S., & Patty, J. W. (2012). Formal Models of Bureaucracy. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 353-377.
Garston, N. (1993). Bureaucracy: Three Paradigms. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.
Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., Donelly, J. H., & Konopaske, R. (2009). Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Processes (14th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Gortner, H. F., Mahler, J., & Nicholson, J. B. (1997). Organization Theory: A Public Perspective (2nd ed.). Florida: Harcourt Brace & Company.
Harney, B. (2015). Adhocracy. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, 11, 1. doi:10.1002/9781118785317.weom110029
Hatch, M. J., & Cunliffe, A. L. (2013). Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic, and Post Modern Perspective (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heckscher, C., & Donnellon, A. (1994). The Post-Bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on Organizational. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
Hummel, R. P. (2015). The Bureaucractic Experience: The Post Modern Challenge (5th ed.). Oxon: Routledge.
Ivanchenko, V., & Ivanchenko, V. (2014). Innovation-Structured Reproduction and the Government. Problems of Economic Transition, 53(10), 52-65. doi: 10.2753/PET1061-1991531004
Johnston, K. (1993). Busting Bureaucracy How to Conquer Your Organization's Worst Enemy. Illionis: R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company.
Kates, A., & Galbraith, J. R. (2007). Designing Your Organization Using the Star Model to Solve 5 Critical Design Challenges. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.
Khanifar, H., Saghari, F., Saeedi, S. R., & Rostami, A. (2013). Changes in Organizational Structure from a Bureaucratic Organization to an Adhocratic One. Management Art, 58, 14144-14148.
Khurosani, A. (2013). Adhocracy Culture Support and Leader’s Working Creativity. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 3(4), 411-415. doi:10.7763/IJSSH.2013.V3.272
Lampropoulou, M., & Oikonomou, G. (2016). Theoretical Models of Public Administration and Patterns of State Reform in Greece. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 0(0), 1-21. doi:10.1177/0020852315611219
Li, T. (2017). How Bureaucratic Power Structure Affects Personnel Structure. Problems of Post-Communism, 1-13. doi:10.1080/10758216.2017.1315309
Liao, C., Chuang, S.-H., & To, P.-L. (2011). How Knowledge Management Mediates the Relationship Between Environment and Organizational Structure. Journal of Business Research, 64(7), 728-736. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.08.001
Lunenburg, F. C. (2012). Organizational Structure: Mintzberg’s Framework. International Journal of Scholarly, Academic, Intellectual Diversity, 14(1), 1-8.
Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational Behavior An Evidence-Based Approach (12th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mackenzie, K. D. (1991). The Organizational Hologram: The Effective Management of Organizational Change. New York: Springer Seience+Business Media.
Maden, C. (2012). Transforming Public Organizations into Learning Organizations: A Conceptual Model. Public Organization Review, 12, 71-84. doi:10.1007/s11115-011-0160-9
Marin-Idarraga, D. A., & Cuartas, J. C. (2016). Organizational Structure and Innovation: Analysis from the Strategic Co-alignment. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 29(4), 388-406. doi:10.1108/ARLA-11-2015-0303
McAuley, J., Duberley, J., & Johnson, P. (2007). Organization Theory: Challenges and Perspectives. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
McLaughlin, G. C., & Kennedy, W. R. (2016). A Guide to Innovation Processes and Solutions for Government. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Menguc, B., & Auh, S. (2010). Development and Return on Execution of Product Innovation Capabilities: The Role of Organizational Structure. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(5), 820-831. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.08.004
Mintzberg, H. (1993). Structure in Five Designing Effective Organizations. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Osadchiy, S. E. (2011). The Dynamics of Formal Organization Essays on Bureaucracy and Formal Rules. Rotterdam,: Erasmus University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/23250
Parikh, M. (2016). Move over Mintzberg, Let Adhocracy Give Way to Ambidexterity. Management Decision, 54(5), 1047-1068. doi:10.1108/MD-07-2014-0483
Prasojo, E., & Kurniawan, T. (2008). Reformasi Birokrasi dan Good Governance: Kasus Best Practices dari Sejumlah Daerah di Indonesia. The 5 th International Symposium of Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia, (pp. 1-15). Banjarmasin.
Scott, W. R. (2014). Institution and Organizations: Idea, Interest, and Identities . Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Setianto, Y. (2010). Birokrasi Tradisional di Jawa dalam Perspektif Sejarah. Paramita, 20(2), 196-177.
Slama-Royer, P. N. (2016). An ‘Adhocracy’ of Stakeholders, The Case of ADSA in France (Essonne). Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 12(1), 1-19. doi:10.1108/JAOC-09-2015-0076
Styhre, A. (2007). The Innovative Bureaucracy: Bureaucracy in an of Fluidity. New York: Routledge.
Toffler, A. (1971). The Future Shock (15 th ed.). New York: Bantam Book.
Travica, B. (1999). New organizational Designs: Information Aspects. Connecticut: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Trondal, J. (2011). Bureaucratic Structure and Administrative Behaviour: Lessons from International Bureaucracies. West European Politics, 34(4), 795-818. doi:10.1080/01402382.2011.572392
Verhoest, K., Roness, P., Verschuere, B., Rubecksen, K., & MacCarthaigh, M. (2010). Autonomy and Control of State Agencies. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Vries, H. d., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2015). Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematics Review and Future Research Agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146-166. doi:10.1111/padm.12209
Waterman, R. J. (1990). Adhocracy The Power of Change. Knoxville: Whittle Direct Books.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society. (E. Fischoff, Trans.) California: University of California Press.
Zhao, S. (1991). “Metatheory, Metamethod, Meta-Data Analysis: What, Why, and How?”. Sociological Perspectives, 34(3), 377-390. doi:10.2307/1389517
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/pjiap.v3i1.1809
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)