Evaluasi Kualitas Sistem Informasi Pergudangan pada Perusahaan Distributor Obat-Obatan Menggunakan Model McCall
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26905/jtmi.v10i2.13965Keywords:
Evaluasi Kualitas, Kualitas Perangkat Lunak, Model McCall, Distributor obat-obatanAbstract
This research was conducted to evaluate the quality of the warehouse information system at a pharmaceutical distribution company in order to provide recommendations regarding system upgrade decisions. Considering the importance of the effectiveness of the warehouse system in maintaining stock accuracy and the smooth distribution of pharmaceuticals, this evaluation uses the McCall Model, which includes the aspects of Product Operation, Product Revision, and Product Transition. The method used involved in-depth interviews with four warehouse staff and two managers who provided deep insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the current system. The interview results indicate that although the system is satisfactory in operational aspects such as data accuracy, reliability, efficiency, integrity, and ease of use, there is significant dissatisfaction regarding maintenance capabilities, flexibility, portability, reusability, and interoperability. While the managers are quite satisfied with the revision aspects, the majority of warehouse staff expressed challenges in system maintenance and adaptation. The biggest issues were found in the system's ability to transition between operational environments, be reused in other applications, and communicate with other systems. This study concludes that improvements are needed in the aspects of maintenance and flexibility, as well as enhanced system integration to meet dynamic operational needs. Suggestions for future research include involving more respondents from various divisions and using additional methods such as quantitative surveys and direct observation to obtain a more comprehensive picture.
Downloads
References
Pusdatin Kemenperin. (2021). Membangun Kemandirian Industri Farmasi Nasional: Buku Analisis Pembangunan Industri Edisi II, Buku Anal. Pembang. Ind., pp. 1-38, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://www.kemenperin.go.id/download/26388/Buku-Analisis-Industri-Farmasi-2021.
S. R. Wicaksono. (2021). Strategi Investasi Teknologi Informasi. Malang: Seribu Bintang, 2021.
L. T. Utomo., Y. T. Ardianto, and N. Sisharini. (2017). Pengaruh Kualitas Sistem, Kualitas Informasi, Kualitas Layanan, Terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna Sistem Informasi Akademik Universitas Merdeka Malang, J. Teknol. dan Manaj. Inform., vol. 3, no. 2, 2017, doi: 10.26905/jtmi.v3i2.1425.
J. Singh and N. B. Kassie. (2018). User’s Perspective of Software Quality,Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Electron. Commun. Aerosp. Technol. ICECA 2018, no. Iceca, pp. 1958–1963, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ICECA.2018.8474755
Y. Thamilarasan, R. R. R. Ikram, M. Osman, and L. Salahuddin. (2023). A Review on Software Quality Models for Learning Management Systems,” J. Adv. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 203–221, doi: 10.37934/ARASET.32.2.203221
R. Fitzpatrick. (1996). Software Quality: Definitions and Strategic Issues,Sch. Comput. Reports, no. April, pp. 1–34
S. R. Wicaksono. (2021). Evaluasi Kualitas Perangkat Lunak. Malang: Seribu Bintang, 2021.
A. Mishra and Z. Otaiwi. (2020). DevOps and software quality: A systematic mapping,” Comput. Sci. Rev., vol. 38, p. 100308, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100308.
Y. A. Kanthi and S. Aminah, (2023). Evaluasi Faktor Keberhasilan dan Kepuasan Pengguna Sistem Informasi Pengaduan Online Kota Malang, J. Teknol. dan Manaj. Inform., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 129-140, 2023, doi: 10.26905/jtmi.v9i2.11036.
V. Arnicane, J. Borzovs, and A. Nesaule-Erina. (2020). Do we really know how to measure software quality?,” CEUR Workshop Proc, vol. 2620, pp. 9-16, 2020.
S. Yolandari, S. Rahmawati, and Mardison. (2024). Evaluation of the Quality of Additional Employee Income using the McCall Method,” J. Comput. Scine Inf. Technol., vol. 10, pp. 1-6, 2024, doi: 10.35134/jcsitech.v10i1.92.
D. Al Fikri, Yuhandri, and Mardison. (2024). Measurement of Health Information Systems Using the McCall Method. J. Comput. Scine Inf. Technol., vol. 10, pp. 31-38, 2024, doi: 10.35134/jcsitech.v10i1.97.
I. D. Lestantri and R. Rosini. (2018). Evaluation of Software Quality to Improve Application Performance Using Mc Call Model,” J. Inf. Syst. Eng. Bus. Intell., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 18, doi: 10.20473/jisebi.4.1.18-24.
I. D. Lestantri, Y. Ahyasi, and E. Suherlan, (2019). Fuzzy approach to the health application quality evaluation process," Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 2603-2607, 2019.
N. Kumar, R. Dadhich, and A. Shastri. (2015). Quality Models for Web-based Application: A Comparative Study, Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 25“32, 2015, doi: 10.5120/ijca2015905840.
A. B. Al-Badareen, M. H. Selamat, M. A. Jabar, J. Din, and S. Turaev. (2011). Software quality models: A comparative study, Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci., vol. 179 CCIS, no. PART 1, pp. 46“55, 2011, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-22170-5_4.
R. S. Jamwal, D. Jamwal, and D. Padha. (2009). Comparative Analysis of Different Software Quality Models, Comput. Nation Dev., 2009, [Online]. Available: http://www.bvicam.ac.in/news/INDIACom 2009 Proceedings/pdfs/papers/79.pdf.
J. A. McCall, P. K. Richards, and G. F. Walters. (1977). Factors in Software Quality - Volume 1 - Concept and Definitions of Software Quality, Def. Tech. Inf. Cent., vol. 1, 2 and 3, no. ADA049014, p. 168, 1977, [Online]. Available: http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA049014.
K. Musa and J. Alkhateeb. (2013). Quality Model Based on Cots Quality Attributes, Int. J. Softw. Eng. Appl., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1“8, 2013, doi: 10.5121/ijsea.2013.4101.
A. Suhari Camara M, K. Aelani, and F. Dwi Juniar S. (2021). Pengujian Kualitas Website menggunakan Metode McCall Software Quality, J. Inf. Technol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 25“32, 2021, doi: 10.47292/joint.v3i1.43.
J. P. Cavano and J. A. McCall. (1978). A framework for the measurement of software quality,Proc. Softw. Qual. Assur. Work. Funct. Perform. Issues, pp. 133“139, 1978, doi: 10.1145/800283.811113.
B. Richard et al. (2021). Qualitative Research via Focus Groups: Will Going Online Affect the Diversity of Your Findings?,Cornell Hosp. Q., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 32“45, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1938965520967769.
R. M. Stair and G. W. Reynolds. (2018). Principles of Information Systems: 13th Edition. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning, 2018.
K. C. Laudon and J. P. Laudon, (2018). Management information systems: managing the digital firm, 8th Edition. Harlow: Pearson, 2018.
J. Valacich and C. Schneider. (2012). Information Systems Today¯: Managing in the Digital World. New York: Pearson, 2012.
M. A. Levin, T. T. Kalal, and J. Rodin. (2019). Improving Product Reliability and Software Quality. Hoboken: Wiley, 2019.
M. Chung, Z.-T. Bae, and J. Le. (2020). Evaluating MIS Performance¯: Comparison of Three Hierarchical Evaluation Types, J. Syst. Inf. Technol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1“16, 2020.
W. Sardjono and A. Retnowardhani. (2019). Analysis of Failure Factors in Information Systems Project for Software Implementation at the organization, Proc. 2019 Int. Conf. Inf. Manag. Technol. ICIMTech 2019, no. August, pp. 141“145, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICIMTech.2019.8843725.
M. Jorgensen and E. Escott. (2022). Relative estimates of software development effort: Are they more accurate or less time-consuming to produce than absolute estimates, and to what extent are they person-independent?,Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 143, no. November 2021, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106782.
G. ORegan. (2019). Concise Guide to Software Testing. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Informatika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
(1)Â Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the journal.
(2) Publisher of JTMI: Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Informatika is University of Merdeka Malang.
(3) The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License (CC BY SA): This license allows to Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially.
