The Public Perceptions and Preferences on Brahu Temple as a Cultural Heritage (Bejijong Village, Trowulan Mojokerto)

Siti Nuurlaily Rukmana; Sucipto Sucipto; Aprillia Putri Eliyanto; Anak Agung Sagung Alit Widyastuty

doi:10.26905/lw.v15i1.8604

The Public Perceptions and Preferences on Brahu Temple as a Cultural Heritage (Bejijong Village, Trowulan Mojokerto)

Siti Nuurlaily Rukmana, Sucipto Sucipto, Aprillia Putri Eliyanto, Anak Agung Sagung Alit Widyastuty

Abstract

The Mojokerto Regency government program is nothing compared to the number of tourists who visit the Brahu temple attraction because there has been a decrease in the number of visitors within the last five years, from 2017-2021. Based on data from the East Java Cultural Heritage Protection and Preservation Agency (BPCB), the number of visitors who visited Brahu Temple was 62,854 in 2017, and there were 1068 people in 2021. The study aimed to determine public perceptions and preferences of Brahu Temple as a Cultural Heritage in Bejijong Village, Trowulan District, Mojokerto. The data collection methods used were observation and a questionnaire. The descriptive and qualitative research methodology uses IPA analysis techniques (Importance Performance Analysis). The study results show that the main priority for visiting a Cultural Heritage site at Brahu Temple is the temple's culture and values. It means visitors who visit the temple have particular goals or interests because they want to know and learn things. It includes temple culture in the form of aesthetics, originality, and the age of the temple, as well as the values contained in a Cultural Heritage at Brahu Temple such as Educational, Religious, Cultural, and Historical Values. In this case, the public perception and preference of Brahu Temple as a Cultural Heritage from the IPA analysis with 115 respondents found that the results

Keywords

Cultural Heritage, Importance Performance Analysis, Perceptions and Preferences

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adara Primadia. (2018). Sejarah Candi Brahu Trowulan Mojokerto Paling Lengkap. Sejarah Lengkap.Com. https://sejarahlengkap.com/agama/buddha/sejarah-candi-brahu

Agustini, N. W. S., Widyatmaja, I. G. N., & Ariana, I. N. J. (2018). Preferensi wisatawan terhadap pemilihan akomodasi di kabupaten bangli bali. Jurnal Kepariwisataan Dan Hospitalitas, 2(1), 22–42.

Alamanda, D. T., Ramdhan, A., & Prasetio, A. P. (2020). Preferensi Wisatawan Nusantara Terhadap Komponen Wisata Papandayan Menggunakan Analisis Konjoin. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kebijakan Publik, 5(52), 27–44.

Aliflyantera, J., Sulistyarso, H., Perencanaan, J., Teknik, F., & Teknologi, I. (2016). Budaya Kecamatan Trowulan , Kabupaten Mojokerto. 5(2), 873–879.

Bahri, S., Kusnoto, Y., Wibowo, B., Hidayat, S., Purmintasari, Y. D., Rivasintha, E., & Superman, S. (2019). Upaya Pelestarian Cagar Budaya Hollandsch Inlandsche School (His) Pertama Di Pontianak. GERVASI: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(1), 146. https://doi.org/10.31571/gervasi.v3i1.1222

Hermuningsih, S., Wardani, K., Meliza, M., Wanto, D., Asha, L., Jayanti, F., Arista, N. T., Cookson, M. D., & Stirk, P. M. R. (2019). Persepsi Masyarakat Sukaraja, Rejang Lebong Terhadap Edaran Menteri Agama Nomor: SE. 6. Tahun 2020 Mengenai Tata Cara beribadah Saat Pandemi. EKOBIS Yogyakarta, 9(2), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.21107/kompetensi.v12i2.4958

Ismiyatin, L., & Sabardila, A. (2021). Upaya Mengoptimalisasi Potensi Wisata Kawasan Eks-Stasiun Puri Sebagai Benda Cagar Budaya Di Kabupaten Pati. Sejarah Dan Budaya : Jurnal Sejarah, Budaya, Dan Pengajarannya, 15(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.17977/um020v15i12021p52-61

Jayanti, F., & Arista, N. T. (2019). Persepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Pelayanan Perpustakaan Universitas Trunojoyo Madura. Competence : Journal of Management Studies, 12(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.21107/kompetensi.v12i2.4958

Kartika Eka Sari, Antariksa ., & Eddi Basuki Kurniawan. (2011). Pelestarian Kawasan Pecinan Kembang Jepun Kota Surabaya Berdasarkan Persepsi Masyarakat. DIMENSI (Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur), 38(2), 89–100. http://puslit2.petra.ac.id/ejournal/index.php/ars/article/view/18492

Keling, G. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Cagar Budaya Di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Sma Â€Œ17Â€1 Yogyakarta. Kebudayaan, 14(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24832/jk.v14i1.193

Pramitasari, R. E., & Muflihah, N. (2019). Wisata Cagar Budaya Sebagai Potensi Sarana Edukasi Di Trowulan. Reaktom : Rekayasa Keteknikan Dan Optimasi, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.33752/reaktom.v3i2.335

Putri Krisnadewi, D. A. P., Sudiarta, I. N., & Suwena, I. K. (2020). Preferensi Dan Persepsi Wisatawan Mancanegara Ke Nusa Penida, Klungkung. Jurnal IPTA, 8(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.24843/ipta.2020.v08.i01.p03

Republik Indonesia. (2010a). Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Mojokerto Nomor 9 Tahun 2010 Tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kabupaten Mojokerto 2012-2032

Republik Indonesia. (2013). Surat Keputusan Mendikbud No. 260/M/2013 Tentang Satuan Ruang Geografis Trowulan Sebagai Kawasan Cagar Budaya Tingkat Nasional.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2010 Tentang Cagar Budaya, 1 (2010).

https://www.bphn.go.id/data/documents/10uu011.pdf

Salam, B., & Suprihardjo, R. D. (2014). Arahan pengembangan Kawasan Wisata Cagar Budaya Trowulan, Kabupaten Mojokerto. Jurnal Teknik POMITS, 2(1), 1–6.

Sejati, P. W., & Dr. Ketut Prasetyo, M. (2017). Pemetaan Industri Batu Bata Merah Di Kawasan Cagar Budaya Trowulan Kecamatan Trowulan Kabupaten Mojokerto. Swara Bhumi, 04(03), 6–15.

Septiani, E., & Santoso, B. (2019). Gili Meno Kabupaten Lombok Utara. 7(2), 141–154.

Tyas, D. P. K., & Susilowati, I. F. (2010). Pengurukan Zona Penyangga Situs Kolam Segaran Di Kawasan Cagar Budaya Nasional ( Kcbn ) Trowulan Mojokerto Dwi Prastiwi Kusnaning Tyas Indri Fogar Susilowati. 1–12.

Wahyuni, I. N., & Tamami, N. D. B. (2021). Preferensi Wisatawan Terhadap Destinasi Wisata Pantai Camplong Kabupaten Sampang. Pamator Journal, 14(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.21107/pamator.v14i1.9536

Yulianingrum, E. V., Wulandari, A., & Chairunnisa. (2018). Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Objek Pelestarian Cagar Budaya Di Kota Pontianak. Jurnal PWK Laut Sipil, 3(1), 77–85.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/lw.v15i1.8604