Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Fiktif Berdasarkan Hukum Positif Di Indonesia

Farid Ramdani

Abstract


This study aims to examine the regulation of silence or pengabain by officials / administrative bodies of the state on requests for state administrative decisions (fictional KTUN). The regulation of the fictitious KTUN currently regulated in Law No. In 1986 concerning the State Administrative Court, Law No. 14 of 2014 concerning Government Administration and Supreme Court Regulation No. 7 of 2018 concerning Procedure Guidelines for Obtaining Decisions Upon Acceptance of Requests to Obtain Decisions and / or Actions by the Agency or Government Officials. The fictitious KTUN arrangements in the three regulations are mutually contradictory, giving rise to confusion in their application. This study attempts toexamine differences in settings, legal consequences and solutions to these differences. This study uses a type of normative research that is prescriptive in nature using a legislative approach and analytical approach. In the case of facing vague legal norms or unclear norms, the judge interprets the Law to find the law. Interpretation by the judge is an explanation that must lead to the implementation that is acceptable to the public regarding legal regulations against concrete events. The method of interpretation is a suggestion or tool to find out the meaning of the law.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v9i2.2763


Keywords


Request, Decisions, Fictions.

References


Аbdullаh, M. Аli. 2015. Teori dаn Prаktek Hukum Аcаrа Perаdilаn Tаtа Usаhа Negаrа Pаscа Аmаndemen. Jаkаrtа, Kecаnа.

Ali, Achmad. 2002. Menguak Tabir Hukum (Suatu Kajian Filosofis dan Sosiologis). Jakarta. Toko Gunung Agung.

Hadjon, Philipus M dan Tatiek Sri Djatmiati. 2009. Argumentasi Hukum. Yogyakarta. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Hamidi, Jazim. 2006 Revolusi Hukum Indonesia: Makna, Kedudukan, dan Implikasi Hukum Naskah Proklamasi 17 Agustus 1945 dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan RI. Jakarta. Konstitusi Press.

Indrati, Maria Farida dan Soeprapto. 1998. Ilmu Perundang-undangan: Dasar-dasar dan Pembentukannya. Yogyakarta. Kanisius.

Marbun, SF. 2004. Dimensi-Dimensi Pemikiran Hukum Administrasi Negara. Yogyakarta. UII Press.

Mawardi, Irvan. 2016. Paradigma Baru PTUN Respon Peradilan Administrasi Terhadap Demokratisasi. Jogyakarta. Thafa Media.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno dan A. Pitlo. 1993. Bab-bab tentang Penemuan Hukum. Jakarta. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. 2002. Mengenal Hukum (Suatu Pengantar). Cet. III. Yogyakarta. Liberty.

Soebekhi, dkk. 2014. Bungа Rаmpаi Perаdilаn Аdministrаsi Kontemporer. Yogyаkаrtа. Gentа Press.

Syahrani, Riduan. 1999. Rangkuman Intisari Ilmu Hukum. Bandung. Citra Aditya Bakti.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





Editorial Office
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum
Faculty of Law University of Merdeka Malang

Information:

address icon redFaculty of Law Building, Terusan Dieng Street 62-64, Malang City, East Java, Indonesia, 65146.
jurnalcakrawalahukum@unmer.ac.id
http://jurnal.unmer.ac.id/index.php/jch/
Phone (0341) 580161 Faks (0341) 588395
width=@jurnalcakrawalahukum
@jurnalcakrawala
Whatsapp IDJCH +6285646664788

Statistics:

Indexing:

width="145" index width="150"
Hasil gambar untuk ebscohost png
ResearchBib Find in a library with WorldCat

Tools:

Turnitin

crossref

MendeleyGrammarly

Supported By:

Fakultas Hukum Universitas Merdeka Malang


Creative Commons License

Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright ©2019 University of Merdeka Malang Powered by Open Journal Systems.