Facilitating student behavioral engagement in ESP classroom through teachers’ scaffolding talk
Abstract
This study aims to describe the language delivered by the teachers in the term of teachers’ scaffolding talk and the behavior engagement responded by the students in ESP agriculture Classroom. The investigation was conducted at a University in Sumbawa Besar, West Nusa Tenggara. Field note and video recordings were used to collect the data. During the observation, the data were then transcribed, simplified, displayed, and interpreted. The result shows there are four kinds of scaffolding talks namely prompting, dialoging, extension, and modeling from six kinds of scaffolding talk. Those scaffolding talks can facilitate the behavioral engagement of the students in ESP Classroom namely paying attention or focusing on the lesson, attempting to answer the question from the teacher, and exerting themselves actively participating in classroom interaction. These result suggest that lecturers and teachers may consider to apply the scaffolding talk before teaching the students in the classroom because methodology used by the teacher in teaching is as important as a talk in teaching.
DOI: 10.26905/enjourme.v4i2.4264
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arif, Q. N., Zain, M., & Refnaldi. (2018). Analyzing Teacher Talk in Classroom. In Seventh International Conference on Language and Arts (Vol. 301, pp. 311–318). Paris: Atlantis Press.
Bertheussen, B. A., & Myrland, Ø. (2016). Relation between academic performance and students’ engagement in digital learning activities. Journal of Education for Business, 91(3), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2016.1140113
Finn, J. D., Pannozzo, G. M., & Voelki, K. E. (1995). Disruptive and Withdrawn Behavior and Achievement among Fourth Graders. The Elementary School Journal, 95.
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student Engagement: What Is It? Why Does It Matter? In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 97–131). New York: Springer.
Forman, R. (2008). Using notions of scaffolding and intertextuality to understand the bilingual teaching of English in Thailand. Linguistics and Education, 19(4), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2008.07.001
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning. (Holly Kim Price, Ed.) (Second edi). Porstmouth: Greenwood Pubilshing Group, Inc.
Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2005). Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect: An Australian Journal of TESOL, 20(1), 6. Arif, Q. N., Zain, M., & Refnaldi. (2018). Analyzing Teacher Talk in Classroom. In Seventh International Conference on Language and Arts (Vol. 301, pp. 311–318). Paris: Atlantis Press.
Bertheussen, B. A., & Myrland, Ø. (2016). Relation between academic performance and students’ engagement in digital learning activities. Journal of Education for Business, 91(3), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2016.1140113
Finn, J. D., Pannozzo, G. M., & Voelki, K. E. (1995). Disruptive and Withdrawn Behavior and Achievement among Fourth Graders. The Elementary School Journal, 95.
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student Engagement: What Is It? Why Does It Matter? In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 97–131). New York: Springer.
Forman, R. (2008). Using notions of scaffolding and intertextuality to understand the bilingual teaching of English in Thailand. Linguistics and Education, 19(4), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2008.07.001
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning. (Holly Kim Price, Ed.) (Second edi). Porstmouth: Greenwood Pubilshing Group, Inc.
Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2005). Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect: An Australian Journal of TESOL, 20(1), 6.
Harbour, K. E., Evanovich, L. L., Sweigart, C. A., & Hughes, L. E. (2015). A brief review of effective teaching practices that maximize student engagement. Preventing School Failure, 59(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2014.919136
Heron, M., & Webster, J. (2018). Scaffolding talk in EAP lessons : an examination of experienced teachers ’ practices teachers ’ practices. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 0(0), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1466892
Kahu, E. R. (2013). Studies in Higher Education Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(January), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
Kayi-Aydar, H. (2013). Scaffolding language learning in an academic ESL classroom. ELT Journal, 67(3), 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct016
Lam, S., Wong, B. P. H., Yang, H., & Liu, Y. (2012). Understanding Student Engagement with a Contextual Model. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 400–419). New York: Springer.
Mahan, K. R. (2020). The comprehending teacher: scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Language Learning Journal, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1705879
Maybin, J., Mercer, N., & Stierer, B. (1992). “Scaffolding” Learning in the Classroom. Thinking Voices, 21–31.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (Third). London: SAGE.
Munir, A. (2012). Indonesian Pre-Service English Teachers ’ Learning and Using Classroom Language. Disertation. Monash University.
Nazari, A., & Allahyar, N. (2012). Increasing Willingness to Communicate among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Students: effective teaching strategies. Metranet.Londonmet.Ac.Uk, 8(Kang 2005), 18–29.
Newman, R. M. C. (2016). Engaging talk: one teacher’s scaffolding of collaborative talk. Language and Education, 31(2), 130–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1261891
Panselinas, G., & Komis, V. (2009). “Scaffolding” through talk in groupwork learning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(2), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.06.002
Patrick, B. C., Skinner, E. A., & Connell, J. P. (1993). What Motivates Children ’ s Behavior and Emotion ? Joint Effects of Perceived Control and Autonomy in the Academic Domain. Journal of Personlity and Social Psychology, 65(4), 781–791.
Rahayu, S. P., & Putri, W. S. (2019). Uploading speaking assignment to YouTube channel as an effort in increasing student’s pronunciation skill. EnJourMe (English Journal of Merdeka) : Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 3(2), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v3i2.2741
Rechard, jack c. (2001). Curriculum Development in LanguageTeaching. Cambridge University Press.
Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, Jangle, 1 and Conceptual Haziness 2 : Evolution and Future Directions of the Engagement Construct. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 4–22).
Romadhon, S. A., & Qurohman, M. T. (2019). Increasing mechanical engineering students’ speaking skills using guided conversation. EnJourMe (English Journal of Merdeka) : Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 4(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v4i1.3252
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the Classroom: Reciprocal Effects of teacher Beahavior and Students Engagement Accross the School Year. Journal of Educational and Psychology, 85.
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233
Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental Dynamics of Student Engagement, Coping, and Everyday Resilience. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 21–42). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
Sofyan, R. R., & Mahmud, M. (2014). Teacher talk in classroom interaction: A study at an English department in Indonesia. Elt Worldwide, 1(1), 45–58.
Szendroi, I. (2010). Teacher Talk in The ESP Classroom: The Result of A Pilot Observation Study Conducted in The Tourism Context. WoPaLP, 4, 39–58.
Walsh, S. (2002). Construction or Obstruction: teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 1–20.
Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. Investigating Classroom Discourse. London and New York: Roudledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203015711
Wediyantoro, P. L. (2016). Improving the Speaking Ability of the Students at Public Vocational School 6 Malang, Indonesia, Using Animation Movies as Teaching Media. EnJourMe (English Journal of Merdeka) : Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 1(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v1i1.276
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Yoana, S. A., Purwati, O., & Anam, S. (2020). The Use of Teacher Talk in Making Students Engaged in EFL Classroom Interaction. Journal Education and Development, 8(1), 205–209.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v5i1.4264
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
EnJourMe (English Journal of Merdeka) : Culture, Language, and Teaching of English |
Jl. Terusan Halimun 11B Malang, 65146, East Java, Indonesia
|
|