Decree on the Payment of Restitution to Deceased Perpetrators of Corruption
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v15i3.15158Keywords:
Conviction, Restitution, CorruptionAbstract
This research is based on a case related to the recovery of financial losses suffered by the state due to a criminal act of corruption in the legal regulations. However, some problems lead to the implementation of the law being hampered when the defendant in the trial is proven to have committed a criminal act of corruption and is proven to have received the proceeds of corruption. This becomes a problem of what status and to whom the restitution is charged if the perpetrator of a corruption crime, who is strongly indicated to have received the proceeds of corruption, has died before being convicted. The research method in this journal is the normative legal method. The result is that this legal vacuum causes sharp differences in judges’ views and is still not by the provisions of the law governing the issue. The prosecutor does not have a clear legal umbrella to file a civil suit against the heirs of the offender who has died. In the future, problems will arise when similar cases occur, so there is no guarantee of legal certainty. The principle of legal certainty must be prioritized as a state of law that prioritizes the basis of legislation, decency, and justice in every policy of state administrations.
Downloads
References
Abramson, Paul R., and Sienna Bland-Abramson. “Racial Animus, Police Corruption, and a Wrongful Conviction of Murder: Complex PTSD and the Vestiges of Anguish”. The Wrongful Conviction Law Review 2 (2) (2021): 103-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29173/wclawr55.
Anam, Mohammad Choirul, Asa Barno Happy Ramadhani, Bagas Sukmo Anggoro, Maya Ariska Sri Dewi, Raynaldo Adwisa Pradita, Ganesya Wahyu Aji Aryasatyani, & Sigit Sapto Nugroho. 2020. “Hukum Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam: Studi Konsep Desa Konservasi Berbasis Kearifan Lokal”. YUSTISIA MERDEKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 6 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33319/yume.v6i1.50.
Benuf, Kornelius, & d Muhamad Azhar. "Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer." Gema Keadilan 7, no. 1 (2020): 20-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504.
Danil, E., & Kurniawan, I. “Optimizing Confiscation of Assets in Accelerating the Eradication of Corruption.” Hasanuddin Law Review, 3(1), 2017: 67-76. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v3i1.717.
Genova Damanik, Kristwan. "Antara Uang Pengganti Dan Kerugian Negara Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi." Masalah-Masalah Hukum 45, no. 1 (2016): 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.45.1.2016.1-10.
Gulo, Famati. “Implementasi Penyidik dan Hakim Mengenai Frasa Unsur Yang Dapat Merugikan Keuangan Negara Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Nomor 65/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2022/Pn Mdn).” RIO LAW JURNAL, Vol 5, No 2 (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36355/rlj.v5i2.1472.
Gusri, Ikhbal. “Implementasi Prinsip Non-Retroaktif Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 Tentang Hak Uji Materil Ditinjau Dari Aspek Keadilan, Kemanfaatan Dan Kepastian Hukum”. Jurnal Hukum Peratun 6 (1) 2023: 1-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.612023.1-34.
Latif, Abdul. “Jaminan UUD 1945 Dalam Proses Hukum Yang Adil”. Jurnal Konstitusi 7 (1) 2016: 049-066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk714.
Mahmud, Ade. “Dinamika Disparitas Pidana Uang Pengganti Dengan Pidana Subsider Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi”. Pamulang Law Review 6 (1) 2023:22-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32493/palrev.v6i1.33375.
Munzil, F., Wr., I. R., & Sukendar, A. “Kesebandingan Pidana Uang Pengganti dan Pengganti Pidana Uang Pengganti dalam Rangka Melindungi Hak Ekonomis Negara dan Kepastian Hukum.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 22(1), (2016): 25–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol22.iss1.art2.
Rahim, Arhjayati & Asma, Noor."Analisis Substansi Pidana Uang Pengganti Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi." Gorontalo Law Review, Volume 3 No. 1 April (2020): 93-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v3i1.910.
Rahmat, Diding. “Formulasi Kebijakan Pidana Denda Dan Uang Pengganti Dalam Penegakan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia”. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 8 (1) (2020):79-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v8i1.686.
Rahmayanti, “The Restitution Of State Financial Losses In Law Enforcement Against Corruption Crime.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Vol 10, No 2 (2023): 280-290. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v10i2.32753.
Renghat Sinaga, & H Abdul Razak Nasution. “Application Of Additional Criminal Sanctions In The Form Of Restitution In Corruption Offences In Indonesia.” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice,” 1(3), (2024): 50–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62951/ijlcj.v1i3.130.
Tajuddin, Mulyadi Alrianto. “Penerapan Pidana Tambahan Uang Pengganti Sebagai Premium Remedium Dalam Rangka Pengembalian Kerugian Negara”. Jurisprudentie : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum 2 (2), 2015: 53-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v2i2.6848.
Triningsih, Anna. “Politik Hukum Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Dalam Penyelenggaraan Negara”. Jurnal Konstitusi 13 (1) 2016: 124-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1316.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
