Legal Ambiguities in the Renewal of Building Use Rights: A Policy and Interpretative Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v15i3.15160Keywords:
Land Rights, Building Use Rights, ExpiredAbstract
The right to use buildings in the Western legal sense before conversion comes from postal rights stipulated in Article 71 of the Civil Code. Government Regulation Number 40 of 1996 states that renewal is submitted no later than 2 (two) years before the expiration of the Right to Use Building, which means that if it has passed 2 (two) years before the end of the Right to Build, the right holder cannot make a renewal of the Right to Use Building that he has. However, in PMNA Number 9 of 1999, it is stated that it is submitted within a grace period of 2 (two) years, which means that even though it has passed 2 (two) years before the Right to Build expires, the right holder can still apply for Renewal of the Right to Build. There are 2 (two) different terms. It is used regarding terms of time for submitting an extension application for Building Use Rights; then, it can give rise to various interpretations and implications. Matter This will affect the determination policies in each office land as the authorized body to grant the extension request the term of Building Use Rights, as well as against the Official Land Deed Maker and other parties who are in contact with the Rights Building.
Downloads
References
Amandah, D., & Khaerulnisa, K. (2024). “Hak Prioritas atas Pewarisan Hak Guna Bangunan yang Telah Berakhir.” Jurnal Intelek dan Cendikiawan Nusantara, 1 (3), 4904-4910. https://jicnusantara.com/index.php/jicn/article/view/751.
Astiti, N. N. A., & Wulandari, I. Akibat Hukum Terhadap Penelantaran Tanah Hak Guna Bangunan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Tambun Bungai, 5 (2), (2020), 800-817. https://doi.org/10.61394/jihtb.v5i2.148.
Ayu, I. K. “Problematika Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Tanah Melalui Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap Di Kota Batu.” Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 27 (1), (2019). 27–40. Retrieved from https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/legality/article/view/8956.
Efeendi, Jonaedi., Ibrahim, Jhonny., “Legal Research Methods (Normative and Empirical). (Depok; Pretone Media Group).
Etha Prianjaya, I Gede., R, Ibrahim., Westra. “Pemberian Kredit Bank Dengan Jaminan Hak Guna Bangunan Yang Jangka Waktunya Telah Berakhir Sedangkan Perjanjian Kreditnya Belum Berakhir.” Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, [S.l.], v. 2, n. 1, p. 127-137, apr. 2017. ISSN 2502-7573. doi: https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2017.v02.i01.p12.
Feddyawan, D. A., & Sukresno, S. “Perlindungan Hukum Bekas Pemegang Hak Terhadap Tanah Bekas Hak Guna Usaha Atau Hak Guna Bangunan Yang Telah Berakhir Haknya.” Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 3 (5), (2023). 5044–5053. Retrieved from https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/5233
Hulu, Klaudius Ilkam, Dalinama Telaumbanua, and Fianusman Laia. “Akibat Hukum Tidak Dilaksanakan Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara”. Jurnal Panah Keadilan 3 (2), 2024. 28-37. https://doi.org/10.57094/jpk.v3i2.1995.
Husein, F. P., Abubakar, L., & Lubis, N. A. Kepastian Hukum Penerapan Jangka Waktu Perpanjangan Hak Guna Bangunan Yang Berakhir Masa Berlakunya Sebagai Obyek Hak Tanggungan Sebelum Perjanjian Pokok Berakhir Dikaitkan Dengan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Yang Berlaku.” Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 2(1), (2018). 84-101. https://jurnal.fh.unpad.ac.id/index.php/acta/article/view/190.
Irmayanti, A., Simanjuntak, K., & Naim, S. (2024). “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Akibat Berakhirnya Jangka Waktu Hak Guna Bangunan Yang Dibebani Hak Tanggungan.” Judge: Jurnal Hukum, 5(02), 120-132. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v5i02.669.
Perangin, Efendi., “Indonesian Agrarian Law: a Study from the Perspective of Legal Practitioner Owners,“ (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. 1991).
Permana, O. L., & Svinarky, I. “Analisis Yuridis Tentang Eksistensi Penerapan Hak Guna Bangunan di Kota Batam.” Scientia Journal: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 5 (4). (2023). Doi: https://doi.org/10.33884/scientiajournal.v5i4.7857.
Putra, Fani Martiawan Kumara. “Tanggung Gugat Debitor Terhadap Hilangnya Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Obyek Jaminan Hak Tangggungan”. Yuridika 28 (2). 2015. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v28i2.1760.
Sappe, Suryani, Adonia Ivone Latturete, and Novyta Uktolseja. "Hak Pakai Atas Tanah Hak Milik dan Penyelesaian Sengketa." Batulis Civil Law Review 2, no. 1 (May 31, 2021): 78-92. doi:10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.560.
Sari, I. “Hak-hak atas tanah dalam sistem hukum pertanahan di Indonesia menurut Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria (UUPA).” Jurnal Mitra Manajemen, 9 (1) (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35968/jmm.v9i1.492.
Sibuea, H. Y. P. ”Arti Penting Pendaftaran Tanah Untuk Pertama Kali.” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan, 2(2), 287-306. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v2i2.218.
Susanto, Urip., “Agrarian Law and Land Rights,“ (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2014).
Tarigan, Staren., ”The owner of Staren Tarigan, the direction of the democratic legal state, strengthens the government's position with a delegation of legalization but restrained,” (Medan: Pustaka Bangsa Press, 2008).
Winarsi, Sri, Essa Adhita Rachmawati, and Oemar Moechthar. “a Study of Priority Principle in Indonesian Agrarian Law System”. People: International Journal of Social Sciences 6 (2) 2020: 535-43. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2020.62.535543.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
