Seizing Social Media Accounts Based on Indonesia and the Netherlands Comparative Criminal Procedure Law

Authors

  • Nahdiya Sabrina University of Merdeka Malang
  • Aris Hardinanto University of Trunojoyo Madura
  • Indah Kumalah University of Trunojoyo Madura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v16i1.15376

Keywords:

Seizure, Social Media, Evidence

Abstract

Investigators to prove the existence of a crime using social media as an intermediary, need to seize objects in the context of cybercrime, which are devices containing social media accounts. Seizure of objects related to criminal acts is regulated in the Code of Criminal Procedure. It becomes a problem whether social media can indeed be classified within the scope of the meaning of objects so that it can be seized. This research is conducted to determine whether social media accounts can be classified as objects under the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the seizure of objects that can be seized. The research methodology used to write this article employs a normative legal research methodology. The results of this study indicate that a person’s social media account cannot be seized because a social media account is not considered an object and does not fall into the classification of objects that can be subject to ownership rights. Seizure of social media accounts cannot be carried out either because it doesn’t meet the material requirements in the Criminal Procedure Code. Although social media accounts cannot be classified as objects, investigators can terminate access to the account belonging to the perpetrator with the owner.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfiandika, M. Fachrizal, and Gelar Ali Ahmad. “Analisis Yuridis Cross Posting Pada Akun Media Sosial Meta Platforms, Inc. yang Disita.” Novum: Jurnal Hukum, (2022): 51-65.https://doi.org/10.2674/novum.v0i0.48777.

Anonim, “Conclusie: ECLI:NL:PHR:2022:220”. Accessed 4 Oktober 2024, https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:HR:2022:220.

Anonim, “Conclusie: ECLI:NL:PHR:2022:687”. Accessed 4 Oktober 2024, https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:HR:2022:687.

Beg, Rijvan, Vivek Bhardwaj, Mukesh Kumar, Prathamesh Muzumdar, Aman Rajput, and Kamal Borana. “Unmasking Social Media Crimes: Types, Trends, and Impact.” Online Social Networks in Business Frameworks, (2024): 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394231126.ch1.

Fajar, Mukti dan Yulianto Achmad, “Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris,” Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar, 2017.

García-Méndez, Carmen, et al. “Social networks: A quality tool for health dissemination?”. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 11(1):355 (2022), DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_355_22.

Hamzah, Andi. “Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia.” Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 2012.

Hardinanto, Aris., Nawawi Arief, Barda., Setiyono, Joko. “Kajian Perluasan Kualifikasi Makna Barang Dalam Yurisprudensi Hukum Pidana Belanda dan Indonesia di Era Siber”. Jurnal Litigasi. April 25 (1):171-191 (2024). https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v25i1.13149.

Kalemi, E., Yildirim-Yayilgan, S., Domnori, E., & Elezaj, O. “SMONT: an ontology for crime solving through social media.” International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 12(2-3), 71-81. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSO.2017.090756.

Kristiana, Yudi. “Teknik Penyidikan dan Pemberkasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Yogyakarta, Thafa Media, 2018.

Mulawarman, M., & Nurfitri, A. “Perilaku Pengguna Media Sosial beserta Implikasinya Ditinjau dari Perspektif Psikologi Sosial Terapan”. Buletin Psikologi. 25(1):36-44 (2017) https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.22759.

Oktana, R., Akub, S., & Maskun, M. “Social Media in the Process of Evidence of Electronic Information and Transaction Crimes”. SIGn Jurnal Hukum. 4(2):320-331 (2023), https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i2.252.

Prasetyo, D. R. “Penyitaan dan Perampasan Aset Hasil Korupsi Sebagai Upaya Pemiskinan Koruptor”. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. 12(24):149-163 (2016). https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v12i24.2243.

Radefi, A., Saputra, A. D., & Widowaty, Y. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Korban Penyitaan Akun Media Sosial dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif”. Media of Law and Sharia. 5(3): 222 (2024) https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v5i3.82.

Rahim, Muhammad Ibnu Fajar, et al. “Penyitaan Barang Bukti Tindak Pidana pada Tingkat Pemeriksaan Persidangan.” Pleno Jure, 9.1: 47-57 (2020) https://doi.org/10.37541/plenojure.v9i1.389.

Sumaidi, S. “Kajian Terhadap Penyitaan Sebagai Pemaksaan Yang Dihalalkan oleh Hukum”. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum. 8(1): 220-244 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v8i1.93.

Sunarso, Siswanto. “Hukum Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.” Jakarta, Rineka Cipta, 2009.

Terry Hutchinson, “Researching and Writing in Law,” Lawbook CO, 2002.

Additional Files

Published

2025-04-01

How to Cite

Sabrina, Nahdiya, Aris Hardinanto, and Indah Kumalah. 2025. “Seizing Social Media Accounts Based on Indonesia and the Netherlands Comparative Criminal Procedure Law”. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 16 (1):9-19. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v16i1.15376.

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.