Tanggung Jawab PT Go-Jek Indonesia terhadap Kerugian yang Diderita Pengemudi Go-Jek Melalui Fitur Go-Food
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v9i1.2119Keywords:
GO-JEK Indonesia, Electronic Agreement, Go-Jek Driver, Irresponsible Consumers, Go-Food.Abstract
Go-Jek is present in Indonesia as one of the application-based online transportation. GO-JEK Indonesia which provides various service features, one of which is Go-Food. Go-Food is a food delivery service for consumers who want certain foods in a restaurant. In practice, there are obstacles in the form of orders by irresponsible consumers with cash payments, namely fictitious orders and cancellation of orders when food has been paid by Mitra to restaurants. This study uses empirical research methods that will examine 3 (three) problems, namely the legal relationship between the parties in the Go-Food feature, GO-JEK Indonesia's responsibilities, and legal protection against the Go-Jek driver who suffered losses in terms of using features Go-Food by irresponsible consumers. In the use of the Go-Jek application, the parties are subject to an electronic partnership agreement. This agreement is classified as a standard agreement and contains several standard clauses which are prohibited by law which result in the agreement being declared null and void. So it is hoped that this research can help the parties to review the clause on the agreement made and the losses experienced by the Go-Jek driver in using the Go-Food feature by irresponsible consumers can be reduced.
How to cite item: Putri Augustti, V., & Sunarjo, S. (2018). Tanggung Jawab PT Go-Jek Indonesia terhadap Kerugian yang Diderita Pengemudi Go-Jek Melalui Fitur Go-Food. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 9(1), 89-98. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v9i1.2119
References
Agustina, Rosa. 2008. Kontrak Elektronik (E-Contract) Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Gloria Juris, Volume 8 Nomor 1. Januari - April 2008.
Buku Panduan GO-JEK Indonesia.
Fadhly, Fabian. 2013. Ganti Rugi Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Akibat Produk Cacat. Jurnal Arena Hukum, Volume 6 Nomor 2. Agustus 2013.
Go-jek.com. “Tentang Go-jek†(Online). https://www.gojek.com/about/. (diakses pada Sabtu, 14 Oktober 2017).
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata).
Line Today. “Pedih! Driver Ojol Wanita Ini Alami Halm Menyedihkan Setelah Dapat Bintang 1, Kisahnya Bikin Sedih!â€(Online). https://today.line.me/ID/article/Pedih+Driver+Ojol+Wanita+Ini+Alami+Hal+Menyedihkan+Setelah+ Dapat+Bintang+1+Kisahnya+Bikin+Sedih-Q1q3Pg?utm_source=
keepshare. (diakses pada Senin, 9 Oktober 2017).
Miru, Ahmadi. 2011. Hukum Kontrak & Perancangan Kontrak. Jakarta. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Muhammad, Abdulkadir. 2011. Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Cetakan Ketiga. Bandung. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 82 Tahun 2012 tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Perjanjian Elektronik (E-Contract) Kerjasama Kemitraan (GO-JEK).
Perjanjian Elektronik (E-Contract) Ketentuan Penggunaan (GO-JEK).
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen
Wiharso, Seta. 2017. E-Contract PT GO-JEK Indonesia Perspektif Hukum Perjanjian Syariah. Tesis. Yogyakarta. Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.