Batasan Kewenangan Penyidik Anak Terkait Pelaksanaan Diversi dalam Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Anak

Authors

  • Megah Novita Endriyanti Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Brawijaya
  • Nurini Aprilianda Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya; Jl. Veteran; Jl. MT. Haryono No 169; Malang; 65145;
  • Abdul Madjid Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya; Jl. Veteran; Jl. MT. Haryono No 169; Malang; 65145;

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v9i2.2259

Keywords:

Boundaries of Authority, Juvenile Investigators, Divertion

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the limits of the authority of the child investigator related to the implementation of diversion in the process of resolving cases of child crimes. To answer the purpose of this paper, normative legal research is used, using the legal approach and case. The results of the study indicate that child investigators in solving cases of child crimes can apply discretion related to the implementation of diversion. The authority limit for discretion of child investigators, namely the reason for implementing diversion that does not fulfill the implementation requirements in the SPPA Law, must be logical and reasonable, not for serious crimes such as criminal acts against the body and life, and not repetitive crimes. In the case of theft with weights, the results of which have been determined by the Chairperson of the Pasuruan City District Court, discretion is taken by the police with various considerations. One of them is because the perpetrators and the victims agreed that the case would be settled in a family manner because the perpetrator still had a brotherly relationship with the victim. Therefore, with several agreements the victims decided to settle the case outside the court process, namely diversion.

How to cite item: Endriyanti, M., Aprilianda, N., & Madjid, A. (2018). Batasan Kewenangan Penyidik Anak Terkait Pelaksanaan Diversi dalam Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Anak. (2), 204-213. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v9i2.2259

References

Gultom, Maidin. 2009. Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia. Jakarta. Refika Aditama.

Prakoso, Abintoro. 2016. Pembaharuan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Yogyakarta. Aswaja Pressindo.

Prakoso, Djoko. 2010. Polri sebagai Penyidik dalam Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta. Bina Aksara.

Pramukti, Angger Sigit dan Fuady Primaharsya, 2015. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Yusitisia.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. 30 Juli 2012. Lembaran Negera Republik Indonesia Tahun 2012 Nomor 153. Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2012 Nomor 5332. Jakarta.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. 8 Januari 2002. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2002 Nomor 2. Jakarta.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-01

How to Cite

Endriyanti, Megah Novita, Nurini Aprilianda, and Abdul Madjid. 2018. “Batasan Kewenangan Penyidik Anak Terkait Pelaksanaan Diversi Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Anak”. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 9 (2):204-13. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v9i2.2259.

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2018): December 2018

Section

Article

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.