Implikasi yuridis putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi nomor 93/PUU-X/2012 terkait dengan penyelesaian sengketa perbankan syariah

Authors

  • Dhaniar Eka Budiastanti Faculty of Law, University of Merdeka Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v11i1.4120

Keywords:

Dispute Resolution, Islamic Banking.

Abstract

Islamic Banking dispute resolution is an effort to resolve the problem carried out by the bank and the customer, if one of the parties is in default. The settlement of the Sharia Banking dispute is based on Law Number 21 of 2008 concerning Sharia Banking, particularly Article 55 of the Law. After the Constitutional Court gave its decision, through the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 93 / PUU-X / 2012, a legal implication occurred, namely the blurring of norms related to the resolution of Sharia Banking disputes. The writing method used is normative juridical, using the statutory approach (Statue Approach) and case approach. The results obtained related to this writing are the creation of a legal uncertainty related to the resolution of disputes outside the court (non-litigation).

How to cite item: Budiastanti, D. (2020). Implikasi yuridis putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi nomor 93/PUU-X/2012 terkait dengan penyelesaian sengketa perbankan syariah. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 11(1), 1-11. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v11i1.4120

Author Biography

Dhaniar Eka Budiastanti, Faculty of Law, University of Merdeka Malang

Dhaniar Eka Budiastanti, S.H., M.Kn. College: Merdeka University Malang E-mail address: debudiastanti@gmail.com EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND 2011 Bachelor (S1) of BRAWIJAYA UNIVERSITY 2015 Masters (S2) of BRAWIJAYA UNIVERSITY FIELD OF COMPETENCE Legal studies Civil law Banking law Capital Market Law Inheritance law Notary Civil Law SCIENTIFIC WORK 2017 Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Penipuan Melalui Internet Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 8 (1), 22-32 2016 Kewenangan Pelaksanaan Putusan Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/puu-x/2012 Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

References

Anshori, Abdul Ghofur. 2009. Hukum Perbankan Syariah. Bandung. Refika Aditama.

KL. 2016. Banten, Perbedaan Litigasi dan Non Litigasi. https://komisiinformasi.bantenprov.go.id.

Lathif, M. (2017). Karakteristik islamic banking dalam hukum perbankan Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 8(1), 1-11. doi:10.26905/idjch.v8i1.1725.

Mardani. 2010. Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama dan Mahkamah Syariah. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.

Neni Sri Imaniyati dan Panji Adam. 2015. Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) No. 93/PUU-X/2012 Terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Nonlitigasi Perbankan Syariah. Jurnal Sosial, Ekonomi, dan Humaniora Unisba.

Nurhasanah, Neneng dan Panji Adam. 2017. Hukum Perbankan Syariah Konsep dan Regulasi. Jakarta. Sinar Grafika.

Otto, Jan, Michael. 2003. Kepastian Hukum di Negara Berkembang, Terjemahan Tristam Moeliono. Jakarta. Komisi Hukum Nasional.

Rahmita, N., & Budiono, R. (2017). Analisis kompilasi hukum islam tentang tolok ukur hibah yang diperhitungkan sebagai warisan. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 8(1), 75-85. doi:10.26905/idjch.v8i1.1733.

Sudiarto. 2015. Negosiasi, Mediasi, dan Arbitrase. Bandung, Pustaka Reka Cipta.

Published

2020-04-27

How to Cite

Budiastanti, Dhaniar Eka. 2020. “Implikasi Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93 PUU-X 2012 Terkait Dengan Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah”. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 11 (1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v11i1.4120.

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2020): April 2020

Section

Article

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.