Upaya administratif dalam penyelesaian sengketa kepegawaian

Mochamad Muslich Haji Sodiq


This paper aims to understand the suitability of the regulations, the implementation of the ASN Law has implications for changing the management paradigm of ASN management. Personnel dispute resolution is one of the things that is of particular concern because of the increasingly complex problems faced. This type of normative legal research uses a statutory approach. Based on the results of the discussion, it was found that administrative efforts were deemed capable of providing answers for the resolution of personnel disputes, but the existing provisions limit the use of these administrative efforts, even though administrative efforts are a reflection of the spirit of deliberation to reach consensus which is characteristic of the Indonesian nation. This study tries to analyze whether administrative efforts in resolving employment disputes are in accordance with legal objectives and whether restrictions on administrative efforts are still relevant at this time. It is hoped that from this research, norm formulations can provide legal certainty in resolving employment disputes. Administrative efforts according to the provisions in the ASN Law are expected to be a solution for the resolution of increasingly complex personnel disputes, but this is contrary to the provisions in the PP on Civil Servant Discipline which limit the use of administrative efforts, so that according to the author it is no longer relevant to be implemented under current conditions.

How to cite item: Sodiq, M. M. H. (2021). Upaya administratif dalam penyelesaian sengketake pegawaian. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 12(1). 60-68.doi:10.26905/idjch.v12i1.4480.


Civil Service Disputes; Administrative Efforts; Diciplinary Punishment.

Full Text:



Abdul Halim. 2009. Teori-teori Hukum Aliran Positivisme dan Perkembangan Kritik-kritiknya. Jurnal Asy-Syir’ah, Vol. 42 No. 11.

Agustina, S. 2017. Analisis tentang pengaturan oleh pemerintah dalam sistem pemerintahan negara hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 5(2), 168-179. doi:10.26905/idjch.v5i2.698.

Ali, H. Zainuddin. 2011. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.

Hartini, Sri. Dkk. 2014. Hukum Kepegawaian di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.

Isrok. 2017. Masalah Hukum Jangan Dianggap Sepele Menyoal The Devils is in The Detail Sebagai Konsep Teori. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya. Malang.

Komarudin. 2017. Praktik Reformasi Birokrasi. Jurnal Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara. Edisi VII Tahun VII. 2017.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2005. Penelitian Hukum. Kencana-Prenada Media Group. Jakarta.

Muslimin, H. (2019). Dinamika Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang–Undangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 10(1), 40-49. doi:10.26905/idjch.v10i1.3187.

S.F. Marbun. 2011. Peradilan Administrasi Negara dan Upaya Administratif di Indonesia. FH UII Press. Yogyakarta.

Soemaryono dan Anna Erliyana. 1999. Tuntunan Praktek Beracara di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Pramedya Pustaka. Jakarta.

Sudrajat, Tedy. 2008. Hukum Kepegawaian. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.

Sugandi, Yogi Suprayogi. 2011. Administrasi Publik: Konsep dan Perkembangan Ilmu di Indonesia, Cetakan Pertama. Graha Ilmu. Jogjakarta.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v12i1.4480


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Faculty of Law - University of Merdeka Malang
Faculty of Law Building, Terusan Dieng Street 62-64
Malang City, East Java, Indonesia, 65146.


Other Link 

Follow Us
See the source image@jurnalcakrawalahukum
See related image detail@Jcakrawalahukum
Phone (0341) 580161
See the source imageFaks (0341) 588395
View JCH Visitors
web statistics

Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.