Sanctions for not being read out by the auction office

I Nengah Gowinda Wijaya

Abstract


Auction minutes that the Class II Auction Officer does not read will affect their validity. The problem in this paper is about how the validity of the deed is not read out by the auction official, as well as the form of legal protection for the Class II Auction Officer for acceptable sanctions due to the auction minutes not being read out in the implementation of an electronic non-execution auction. This paper aims to analyze the validity of the deed that was not read out by the auction official in the performance of an electronic non-execution auction and a form of legal protection for Class II auction officials. This writing uses a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The study results indicate that the minutes of auction through the internet media have fulfilled the elements contained in Article 1868 of the Civil Code. Legal protection for Class II Auction Officials can be carried out in 2 (two) ways: preventive legal protection, namely by making new rules or improving the provisions of the old laws. Repressive legal protection is to take legal action in the form of an appeal against the Administrative Court or an appeal against the Supreme Court. In the request and cassation, repressive legal protection should be prioritized.

How to cite item: Wijaya, I. N. G., (2022), Sanctions for not being read out by the auction office. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 13(2). 164-174. doi:10.26905/idjch.v13i2.7741.


Keywords


Legal Protection; Auction Official; Electronic Non-Execution Auction.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al Qindy, F. H. (2021). Inkonsistensi Pengaturan Kewenangan Pembuatan Risalah Lelang oleh Notaris. Notaire, 4(3), 355–372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v4i3.30136.

Dahana, M. M. (2012). Perlindungan Hukum dan Keamanan Terhadap Wisatawan. Surabaya: Penerbit Paramita Publisher.

Dewi, N., & Resen, M. (2021). Harmonisasi Kewenangan Pembuatan Risalah Lelang Antara Notaris Dengan Pejabat Lelang. Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 6(01), 41– 51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2021.v06.i01.p04.

Enrawati. (2020). Tinjauan Hukum Atas Pembatalan Risalah Lelang Karena Adanya Kepentingan Yang Dirugikan Akibat Dari Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 486 K/TUN/2017). Al-Hikmah, 1(2), 90-106, DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/jhah.v1i2.3337.

Ferels, L. (2021). Analisis Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Lelang Kelas I Atas Kesalahan Redaksional Risalah Lelang Terkait Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Melalui Permohonan Kepada Ketua Pengadilan (Studi Kasus: Penetapan Nomor 02/EKS.HT/2018/PN.SNT. Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 4 (2), 2812-2836, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v4i2.17774.

Hadjon, P. M. (2007). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.

Intan, L. (2016). Akibat Pelanggaran Oleh Notaris Terhadap Pembuatan Akta Notariil. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 7(2), 206-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v7i2.1909.

Karina, A. S., Sukarmi, & Kawuryan, E. S. (2020). Keabsahan Akta Risalah Lelang Sebagai Akta Otentik Dalam Pelaksanaan Lelang Elektronik Oleh Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang. Jurisdictie, 11(1), 1-15, DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/j.v11i1.7421.

Mangunsong, I. H. (2020). Kekuatan Mengikat Risalah Lelang Terhadap Hak Tanggungan Bagi Pembeli Lelang Di Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara Dan Lelang (Kpknl) Medan. Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP), 3(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.34012/jihap.v3i2.1292.

Marziah, A. (2019). Pembuktian Risalah Lelang Bagi Pemenang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan. Jurnal IUS, Volume 7 (2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v7i2.631.

Miptahul. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat Bagi Pengguna Media Sosial Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik (Studi Putusan No. 3168/PID.SUS/2018/PN.MDN). Sosek, 1(2), 47-87, DOI: https://doi.org/10.55357/sosek.v1i2.58.

Muchsin. (2003). Perlindungan dan Kepastian Hukum bagi Investor di Indonesia. Surakarta: Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Natadimaja, H. (2009). Hukum Perdata Mengenai Hukum Orang dan Hukum Benda. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Graha Ilmu Publisher.

Notoatmojo, S. (2010). Etika dan Hukum Kesehatan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Salim, V. P., & Subagyono, B. S. A. (2022). Keabsahan Lelang Non Eksekusi Sukarela Secara Online Tanpa Pejabat Lelang. Notaire, 5(1), 155–178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v5i1.33641.

Sudiarto, S., Kurniawan, K., & Hirsanuddin, H. (2021). Kedudukan Akta Risalah Lelang Sebagai Bukti Peralihan Hak Milik Atas Tanah Bagi Warga Negara Asing. Jatiswara, 36(2), 149-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jatiswara.v36i2.282.

Triwulan, T., & Febrian, S. (2010). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pasien. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.

Zaki, B. F. (2017). Kepastian Hukum Dalam Pelelangan Objek Hak Tanggungan Secara Online. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no2.748.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i2.5896

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



JURNAL CAKRAWALA HUKUM

Faculty of Law - University of Merdeka Malang

Faculty of Law Building, Terusan Dieng Street 62-64
Malang City, East Java, Indonesia, 65146.

View JCH Visitors
web statistics

Other Link

Follow Us

See the source image@jurnalcakrawalahukum
See related image detail@Jcakrawalahukum
jurnalcakrawalahukum@unmer.ac.id
Phone (0341) 580161
See the source imageFaks (0341) 588395


Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.