Kedudukan notaris sebagai turut tergugat dalam perkara perdata

I Gusti Ngurah Adnyana

doi:10.26905/idjch.v13i1.7741

Kedudukan notaris sebagai turut tergugat dalam perkara perdata

I Gusti Ngurah Adnyana

Abstract

The filing of a lawsuit to the court must meet the formal requirements of the lawsuit, including the plaintiff and the defendant must be complete based on a legal relationship and based on the fact that the party in control or the party claiming to have a right to an object must also be sued. The incompleteness of the parties in a lawsuit can cause the lawsuit to be declared lacking parties so that the lawsuit can be declared unacceptable. However, for a lawsuit based on a deed made before a notary where the position of the notary in a lawsuit is very dependent on the arguments of the lawsuit filed by the plaintiff. The problem to be raised is whether the notary has a legal relationship with the parties who made the deed, or does the notary have a legal obligation to be responsible if one of the parties making the deed suffers a loss? This writing uses a normative method. The results and discussion show that the position of the notary as a party to a lawsuit based on the deed he made must pay attention to the basis or argument of the lawsuit such as default, or cancellation due to false information, or acts against the law. Thus, it can be said that a lawsuit based on a deed made by a notary where the notary is not included as a co-defendant does not necessarily mean that the plaintiff's claim can be declared lacking parties so that the lawsuit is NO.

How to cite item:

Adnyana, I. (2022). Kedudukan notaris sebagai turut tergugat dalam perkara perdata. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 13(1), 49-57. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i1.7741.

Keywords

Notary; Co-Defendant, Case; Civil.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Afriana, A. 2020. Kedudukan dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Sebagai Pihak Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Indonesia Terkait Akta Yang Dibuatnya. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 1(2), 246-261. https://doi.org/10.23920/jphp.v1i2.250.

Andhika, A.R. 2016. Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Dalam Perkara Pidana Berkaitan Dengan Akta Yang Dibuatnya Menurut Undang-undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004. Premise Law Jurnal. Vol 1 (2016): Volume I Tahun 2016.

Dinata, I.W.W. & Bagiastra, I.N., 2017. Cara Mengajukan Gugatan dan Perubahan Gugatan Dalam Praktek Peradilan Hukum Acara Perdata. Kertha Negara. Vol. 05, No. 04, Oktober 2017.

Harahap, M. Yahya. 2005. Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, Cetakan Kedua.

Hutagalung, Sophar Maru. 2010. Praktik Peradilan Perdata. Teknis Menangani Perkara di Pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. Cetakan Pertama.

Hutagalung, Sophar Maru. 2012. Praktik Peradilan Perdata dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, Cetakan Pertama.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. 2002. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty. Edisi keenam cetakan pertama.

Prinst, Darwin. 2002. Strategi Menyusun dan Menangani Gugatan Perdata. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti Cetakan III.

Rachmatullah, Amanda Puteri. 2021. Analisis yuridis pengelompokan wilayah pada notaris berkaitan norma perhitungan penghasilan neto terkait pejabat umum. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum. Volume 12 No. 2 Agustus 2021.

Sitompul, P.H. 2016. Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Dalam Melaksanakan Tugasnya Sebagai Pejabat Publik Terhadap Akta yang diterbitkan Menimbulkan Perkara Pidana (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 1014 K/PID/2013). Premise Law Jurnal. Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016.

Soeroso, R. 1993. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, Cetakan Pertama.

Wijaya, W.W., 2019. Perkembangan Hukum Akta Notaris sebagai alat bukti dalam kerangka Hukum Acara Perdata. Premise Law Jurnal. Vol 10 (2019): Volume 10 Tahun 2019.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i1.7741