Optimizing the role of political party courts in resolving internal political party disputes
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to provide suggestions for new legal concepts, to optimize the role of the Political Party Court, using normative juridical law research methods and approaches to laws, cases, and comparative law approaches. The mechanism for resolving internal disputes within political parties is regulated in Article 32 of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2011 concerning Amendments to Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2008 about Political Parties (Political Parties Law), which states that it can be done through the Court of Political Parties. Furthermore, Article 33 of the UUPP can submit the settlement mechanism through a lawsuit to the District Court and the Supreme Court. The legal fact is that from several internal political party dispute cases, the settlement process is not only done through these two methods. However, someone suddenly created a rival Extraordinary Congress, seeking legal tendencies at the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia to file a lawsuit with the State Administrative Court. So it is necessary to have a new legal concept to optimize the role of the Political Party Court and a one-door mechanism for resolving internal disputes of political parties.
How to cite item:
Anggriawan, F., Amrulla, M., & Lailawati, F. (2022). Optimizing the role of political party courts in resolving internal political party disputes. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 13(2), 145-156. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i2.7962.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anggriawan, F. (2020). Reformulasi domain hukum ideologi Pancasila oleh Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 11(1), 31-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v11i1.4045.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Partai Politik dan Pemilihan Umum Sebagai Instrumen Demokrasi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 3(4), 6-27.
Jamaluddin, J. (2020). Kewenangan Mahkamah Partai Dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Internal Partai Politik Lokal Di Aceh Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2011 Tentang Partai Politik. Suloh: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 8(1), 29-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/sjp.v8i1.2486.
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Kharisma Putra Utama.
Mochtar, Z. (2019). Pertanggungjawaban Partai Politik Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 31(2), 157-173. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22146/jmh.29199.
Muladi. (2002). Politik dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Nahuddin, Y. E. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Keuangan Partai Politik Menuju Tata Kelola Partai Politik Yang Baik. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 6(2), 276-292. DOI : 10.26905/idjch.v6i2.1462.
Permana, T. C. I. (2016). Model Penyelesaian Perselisihan Partai Politik Secara Internal Maupun Eksternal. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 5(1), 35-52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.5.1.2016.35-52.
Porto, B. L. (1991). The Constitution and Political Parties: Supreme Court Jurisprudence and Its Implications for Party-building. Const. Comment., 8, 433.
Soedarno. (2005). Mahkamah Kontitusi Sebagai Pengawal Demokrasi; Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil Pemilu 2004 oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia RI, Jakarta. Sekretariat Jendral dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia RI.
Suwito & Patra, D.D., (2016) Perselisihan Internal Partai Politik Dalam Berbagai Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Adhi Sarana Nusantara.
Wington, R. C. (1999). American Political Parties Under the First Amendment. Journal of Law and Policy, 7(2), 2. Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/jlp/vol7/iss2/2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i2.7962
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. |