Legal protection for consumers whose certificates are collateralized by the developer

Johanes Rodo Mulia; Eko Wahyudi

doi:10.26905/idjch.v13i3.8389

Legal protection for consumers whose certificates are collateralized by the developer

Johanes Rodo Mulia, Eko Wahyudi

Abstract

This study analyzes the Consumer Protection law in adequately protecting home buyers at Violet Garden, Bekasi. These consumers are faced with losing their house certificates because they have guaranteed them to a non-pawnbroker bank (Maybank). Finally, the Central Jakarta Commercial Court ruled that the developer was bankrupt because he was unable to pay his debts. The curator invites the buyer to participate in paying off the developer's debt, which amounts to approximately fifty percent of the purchase price. This investigation uses a normative juridical approach, namely a truth-seeking procedure based on the logic of legal studies from a normative point of view. The results of this study are that banks must protect consumer rights and not cause problems that result in material losses experienced by consumers. Consumers can file lawsuits because the parties responsible for this case are PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk, PT Bank Tabungan Negara Tbk, and PT Nusuno Karya, and the element of tort has been fulfilled. However, currently, there are no regulations that strictly regulate how a house can be sold by a developer so that the state can protect consumers.

How to cite item:

Mulia, J., & Wahyudi, E. (2022). Legal protection for consumers whose certificates are collateralized by the developer. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 13(3), 281-290. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i3.8389.

Keywords

Consumer Protection; Home Certificates; Unlawful Acts.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adichandra, M., & Setianingrum, R. (2022). Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembeli Rumah dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepailitan Pengembang. Media of Law and Sharia, 3(1), 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v3i1.13222.

Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean Ethics. terj. W.D. Ross. Kitchener: Batoche Books.

Ayuningtyas, N. D., Al-Farizi, S., Budiwati, S., (2015). Akibat Hukum Terhadap Pembatalan Akta Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah (studi di kantor notaris dan ppat tangerang, jln. Pemda tigaraksa desa Bojong, kecamatan cikupang kab. Tangerang). Doctoral dissertation, Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/ius.v7i2.619.

Harahap, M. Y. (2017). Hukum acara perdata: tentang gugatan, persidangan, penyitaan, pembuktian, dan putusan pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Johnny, I. (2008). Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayu Media.

Prayogo, S. (2016). Penerapan batas-batas wanprestasi dan perbuatan melawan hukum dalam perjanjian. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 3(2), 280-287. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v3i2.1453.

Shofie, Y. (2000). Perlindungan Konsumen dan Instrumen-instrumen hukumnya. Malang: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Simamora, N. A., Kamello, T., Sembiring, R., & Leviza, J. (2015). Asas Itikad Baik Dalam Perjanjian Pendahuluan (Voor Overeenkomst) Pada Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Rumah (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Simalungun No 37/Pdt/Plw/2012/Sim). USU Law Journal, 3(3), 84-96.

Slamet, S. R. (2013). Tuntutan Ganti Rugi Dalam Perbuatan Melawan Hukum: Suatu Perbandingan Dengan Wanprestasi. Lex Jurnalica, 10(2), 18068.

Tanaya, V. (2013). Rekontruksi Asas Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Onrechtmatigedaad) Dalam Gugatan Sengketa Konsumen. Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum, 47(1). DOI: 10.14421/ajish.2013.47.1.%p.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i3.8389