The validity of the notary's self-safety clause in the notary deed

Natalia Budiman, Ni Made Ayu Sekar Kinasig, Tang Monica Christina Pangandaheng, Aida Qothrin Nada

Abstract


The results of this study show that the self-security clauses listed by the notary in the deeds did not violate the provisions of laws and regulations, especially the UUJN. That is, the clause is validly stated on the condition that the notary lists the clause based on the statements of the complainants and that the statements or statements and supporting documents as a reference for making a notarial deed are valid, so if in the future it is known that there are wrong things, then the notary can use the clause as a form of effort to secure themselves or as a form of notarial resistance if the notary is used as a witness, the suspect/defendant, the defendant/co-defendant because of the deed he made. Juridically, the notary's self-protection clause does not have the legal force to bind third parties such as prosecutors, public prosecutors, or judges, so the clause cannot provide legal immunity for the notary if the notary can indeed be proven guilty in advance of the court. The clause only applies to notaries who have carried out the position's duties, especially in doing deeds by the provisions of the UUJN and laws and regulations.

How to cite item: 

Budiman, N., Kinasig, N., Pangandaheng, T., & Nada, A. (2022). The validity of the notary's self-safety clause in the notary deed. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 13(3), 300-307. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i3.8616.

Keywords


Notary; Personal Security Clause; Notarial Deed.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adjie, H. (2004). Penggerogotan Wewenang Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Umum. Jakarta: Renvoi.

Adjie, H. (2021). Penerapan Pasal 38 UUN-P dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas Jabatan Notaris. Yogyakarta: Bintang Pustaka Madani.

Boty, R. (2017). Kekuatan Akta Notaris Dalam Menjamin Hak Keperdataan. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), 3(1), 85-98. Available at: http://e-jurnal.stih-pm.ac.id/index.php/cendekeahukum/article/view/12/19.

Kosuma, I. P. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Dalam Penyisipan Klausul Pelepasan Gugatan Notaris Atas Akta Yang Dibuatnya. Notaire, 4(1), 23-42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v4i1.25297.

Nisa, N. Z. (2021). Urgensi Pencantuman Klausul Eksonerasi Pada Akta Pihak (Partij Acte). (Doctoral dissertation, UNKNOWN).

Pramono, D. (2015). Kekuatan pembuktian akta yang dibuat oleh notaris selaku pejabat umum menurut hukum acara perdata di Indonesia. Lex Jurnalica, 12(3), 147736.

Safira, A., & Putra, M. F. M. (2022). Kekuatan Pembuktian Salinan Akta Auntentik Yang Dikeluarkan Oleh Notaris Pemegang Protokol. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 5(2), 584-592. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i2.5242.

Sasauw, C. (2015). Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Kekuatan Mengikat Suatu Akta Notaris. Lex Privatum, 3(1). Avaluible at: https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/7030.

Septianingsih, K. A., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Dewi, A. A. S. L. (2020). Kekuatan Alat Bukti Akta Otentik Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 2(3), 336-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.2.3.2020.336-340.

Setiadewi, K., & Hendra Wijaya, I. M. (2020). LEGALITAS AKTA NOTARIS BERBASIS CYBER NOTARY SEBAGAI AKTA OTENTIK. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 6(1), 126–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v6i1.23446.

Siahaan, K. (2019). Kedudukan Hukum Akta Notaris Sebagai Alat Bukti Pada Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana. Recital Review, 1(2), 72-88. Avaluible at: https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/RR/article/view/7455.

Tjukup, I. K., Layang, I. W. B. S., Nyoman, A. M., Markeling, I. K., Dananjaya, N. S., Putra, I. P. R. A., & Tribuana, P. A. R. (2016). Akta Notaris (Akta Otentik) Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Peristiwa Hukum Perdata. Acta Comitas, 2, 180-188.

Wijaya, P. A. P. D., & Prajitno, A. A. (2018). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Kesalahan Dalam Pembuatan Akta Yang Dilakukan Oleh Notaris Penggantinya. Perspektif, 23(2), 112-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v23i2.684.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i3.8616

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



Publisher: 
Faculty of Law - University of Merdeka Malang
Faculty of Law Building, Terusan Dieng Street 62-64
Malang City, East Java, Indonesia, 65146.

  

Other Link 

Follow Us
See the source image@jurnalcakrawalahukum
See related image detail@Jcakrawalahukum
jurnalcakrawalahukum@unmer.ac.id
Phone (0341) 580161
See the source imageFaks (0341) 588395
View JCH Visitors
web statistics

Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.