Juridical review of construction contract disputes in Indonesia

Supriyadi Supriyadi; Mohammad Gufron AZ; Kadek Wiwik Indrayanti

Juridical review of construction contract disputes in Indonesia

Supriyadi Supriyadi, Mohammad Gufron AZ, Kadek Wiwik Indrayanti

Abstract

Nowadays, the method of resolving disputes through the judiciary has received very sharp criticism from practitioners and legal theorists. The roles and functions of the judiciary are considered to be heavy, slow, take a long time, cost a lot of money, unresponsive in seeing the public interest, and too formal and technical. The problem to be raised in this research is how to resolve construction work contract disputes in Indonesia as regulated in Law Number 2 of 2017 concerning construction services and how to compare construction work contract dispute resolutions through adjudication and arbitration. The results of this study are Based on the description in the Discussion section. It is concluded that the Construction Services Act only stipulates one settlement mechanism, namely dispute resolution out of court (non-litigation). Even in the Construction Work Contract, there is no room to make efforts to resolve disputes through court institutions. Thus, the philosophy (spirit) carried is the concept of a "win-win solution." The stages of dispute resolution efforts include mediation, conciliation, and arbitration. Implementing mediation, conciliation, and arbitration may refer to Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution.

How to cite item:

Supriyadi, S., Gufron AZ, M., & Indrayanti, K. (2022). Juridical review of construction contract disputes in Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 13(3), 325-336. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i3.8916.

Keywords

Contract; Dispute; Construction.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arbitrase, A. D. P. D., (2017). Penyelesaian Sengketa Kontrak Kerja Konstruksi Melalui Ajudikasi dan perbandingan dengan Arbitrase. Jurnal Magister Konotariatan, 5 (2), 240-251.

Chandra, A. I., (2021). Penyelesaian Sengketa Kontrak Konstruksi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 Tentang Jasa Konstruksi. Inrichting Recht: Wahana Wacana Bidang Hukum, 3(2).

Hansen, Seng., (2005). Manajemen Kontrak Konstruksi. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Hernoko, A. Y., (2010). Hukum Perjanjian Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersial. Jakarta: Kencana.

Kamaluddin, K. (2021). Wanprestasi Dalam Kontrak Kerja Konstruksi Yang Mengakibatkan Kerugian Negara Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 Tentang Jasa Konstruksi. Journal Of Law (Jurnal Ilmu Hukum), 6(2), 365-370.

Kolopaking, A. D. A., (2013). Asas Itikad Baik dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kontrak Melalui Arbitrase. Bandung: Alumni.

Nasution, A., & Simorangkir T., (2010). Masalah Hukum Arbitrase Online. Jakarta: BPHN Kemenkumham RI.

Nugroho, S. A., (2015). Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase dan Penerapan Hukumnya. Jakarta: Kencana.

Pratama, Z. Z. B. (2020). Kewenangan Ajudikasi Oleh Ombudsman Republik Indonesia Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Pelayanan Publik. JOURNAL EQUITABLE, 5(1), 89-107.

Priyambodo, M. A., (2021). Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Konstruksi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 Tentang Jasa Konstruksi. Iblam Law Review, 1(3), 173-177.

Rajagukguk, E., (2001). Arbitrase dalam Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Chandra Pratama.

Sariono, J. N., & Wibawanto, A. D., (2006). Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Melalui Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). Perspektif, 11(3), 245-257.

Simamora, Y. S., (2017). Hukum Kontrak: Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Kontrak Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Pemerintah Di Indonesia. Surabaya: Laksbang Pressindo.

Yasin, N., (2004). Mengenal Klaim Konstruksi dan Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.