Kekuatan Hukum Sertifikat Hak Tanggungan yang Terbit atas Adanya Unsur Onbeschikking Bevoeg Pemberi Hak Tanggungan atas Obyek Hak Tanggungan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v6i2.16373Keywords:
Authority, Rights, Certificate, LegalAbstract
The lack of authority of a party who does not have the right to place a mortgage on a creditor which in the future results in a dispute, whether criminal or civil, has different legal consequences. So it is appropriate to know the legal strength of proof of the mortgage right certificate in terms of the registration system in Indonesia and the legal consequences of issuing mortgage rights which occur on the basis of the mortgagor's lack of authority over the object of the mortgage right. The research uses normative research methods with analytical descriptive analysis techniques. The Mortgage Rights Certificate has strong evidentiary power if it meets three main aspects. First, the existence of cadastral data plots, namely data related to land conditions, such as location, area and land boundaries, which are obtained from accurate measurements of land plots. Second, creating a public register that records the names of land rights holders. This general list is officially managed by the relevant agencies and is a trusted source of information. Third, implementing a publication system that shows openness of information to the public, allows other parties to know the status of land rights clearly. In the context of the issuance of an invalid mortgage right due to non-compliance with applicable legal provisions, a mortgage right can be deemed to have no legal force if the party providing the mortgage right is not registered as the legal owner of the object in question. This will cause losses for the party who receives the mortgage right because they cannot rely on the mortgage right to execute the debt if the debtor does not fulfill his obligations. Non-compliance or violation of the authority and provisions governing legal validity can result in serious legal consequences, such as cancellation of mortgage rights, loss of rights to objects guaranteed, or even material losses for interested parties.
Downloads
References
Bahsan, M. (2007). Hukum jaminan dan jaminan kredit perbankan Indonesia. Raja Grafindo Persada
Ghaniyyu, F. F., Pujiwati, Y., & Rubiati, B. (2022). Jaminan kepastian hukum konversi sertipikat menjadi elektronik serta perlindungannya sebagai alat pembuktian. Jurnal USM Law Review, 5(1), 172. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4553
Hidayat, R., & Soegianto, S. (2019). Penyelesaian debitur wan prestasi atas obyek jaminan fidusia yang telah didaftarkan. Jurnal USM Law Review, 2(2), 288. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v2i2.2275
Isnaini, H., & Wanda, H. D. (2017). Prinsip kehati-hatian Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah dalam peralihan tanah yang belum bersertifikat. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 24(3), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss3.art7
Limbong, B. (2012). Hukum agraria nasional. Pustaka Margaretha.
Listyawati, H. (2012). Kegagalan pengendalian alih fungsi tanah dalam perspektif penatagunaan tanah di Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum, 22(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16207
Manthovani, R., & Istiqomah, I. (2021). Pendaftaran tanah di Indonesia. Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.36722/jmih.v2i2.744
Mertokusumo, S. (2014). Teori hukum. Cahaya Atma
Putra, F. M. K. (2015). Tanggung gugat debitor terhadap hilangnya hak atas tanah dalam obyek jaminan hak tanggungan. Yuridika, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v28i2.1760
Santoso, U. (2007). Sertipikat sebagai tanda bukti hak atas tanah. Jurnal Era Hukum, Edisi 1 Tahun 15.
Subiharta. (2015). Moralitas hukum dalam hukum praksis sebagai suatu keutamaan. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 4(3), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.4.3.2015.385-398
Sukino, T. T. S., & Syafrinaldi, S. (2023). Penyelesaian sengketa non-performing loan melalui mediasi dalam sistem peradilan perdata (Eksekusi jaminan hak tanggungan). Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, 6(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhmo.v6i2.9293
Sumardjono, M. S. W. (2008). Tanah dalam perspektif hak ekonomi sosial dan budaya. Kompas.
Usanti, T. P. (2012). Lahirnya hak kebendaan. Perspektif, 17(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v17i1.93
-----------, T. P. (2013). Hukum jaminan. Revka Petra Media
Wardani, W. I. (2018). Kepemilikan hak atas tanah dalam kerangka politik hukum agraria nasional. Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.36356/hdm.v15i2.684
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: MLJ Merdeka Law Journal is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) is applied when mandated by research funders, such as those who have signed. Open Access articles in MLJ Merdeka Law Journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
