Eksistensi Digital Evidence dalam Hukum Acara Perdata
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v10i1.2616Keywords:
Electronic Evidence, Civil Procedure Code, Evidence.Abstract
Electronic Evidence Tools can be presented at the hearing as valid evidence and have been regulated separately in the ITE Law. However, in the Civil Procedure Law the formal legality has not been regulated how to show. Formulation of the problems raised in this writing (1) How is the legal certainty of the Electronic Evidence in the Civil Procedure Code; (2) What is the ideal arrangement regarding Electronic Evidence Tools in Civil Procedure Code; The first discussion is that Article 5 Paragraph (1) and (2) of Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions (UU ITE) which only provides legal certainty to the extent of the recognition of the existence of Electronic Evidence Tools as valid evidence. There must be an ideal arrangement regarding the Electronic Evidence Tool in the Civil Procedure Code to ensure the legal certainty of the procedure for submission and enforcement is: first, with a mechanism for renewing the HIR and RBg. Second, the party that has the authority to stipulate a Circular of the Supreme Court on how the parties know and see the Electronic Evidence Tool and the procedure for submitting Electronic Evidence Tools.
How to cite item: Maulidiyah, N., & Satriana, Y. (2019). Eksistensi Digital Evidence dalam Hukum Acara Perdata. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 10(1), 69-76. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v10i1.2616
References
Fakhriah, Efa Laela. Sistem Pembuktian Terbuka Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Secara Litigasi. http://pustaka.unpad.ac.id.
Heniyatun, Iswanto. Bambang Tjatur, Sulistyaningsih.Puji, Kajian Yuridis Pembuktian dengan Informasi Elektronik dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan, Journal Varia Justicia . Vol.14 No.1 Tahun 2018.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, eksistensi dokumen di persidangan perdata, access www.mahkamah agung.go.id.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. 1996. Mengenal Hukum (Suatu Pengantar). Yogyakarta. Liberty.
Mudiardjo.Rapin, Mengantar Informasi Elektronik ke Pengadilan sebagai Alat Bukti yang Sah. Access www.warta ekonomi.com.
Nugraha, Irma. 2013. Pembuktian Alat Bukti Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Dalam Pembobolan Atm. Skripsi.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/PUU-XIV/2016.
Sugiarto, Enan. Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/PUU/-XIV/2016/ Terhadap Informasi Elektronik dan/atau Dokumen Elektronik Dan/Atau Hasil Cetaknya Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara. Journal Rechtidee, Vol.11 No.2.
Sutantio, dkk. 1995. Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktek. Bandung. Mandar Maju.
Undang-Undang No.19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE).
Wahyudi.Johan, Dokumen Eelektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Pada Pembuktian Di Pengadilan, https://www.researchgate.net, Journal Perspektif. Volume XVII No.2. Tahun 20012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
