Implikasi Yuridis Penetapan Hakim Berkaitan Diversi yang Melanggar Ketentuan Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak

Megah Novita Endriyanti; Nurini Aprilianda; Abdul Madjid

doi:10.26905/idjch.v10i1.2947

Implikasi Yuridis Penetapan Hakim Berkaitan Diversi yang Melanggar Ketentuan Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak

Megah Novita Endriyanti, Nurini Aprilianda, Abdul Madjid

Abstract

This diversion is the process of resolving cases of violations of law that occur, namely by bringing together the victims and their families and the perpetrators as well as their families to sit together to discuss the settlement of cases in a family manner. Legislation on the juvenile justice system. To answer the purpose of the paper, normative legal research is used, using a legal approach used to examine the Child Criminal Justice System Act, while the case approach uses the determination of judges in the case of Children. The results of the study indicate that the juridical implication of the judges’ determination regarding diversion which violates the provisions of the law on juvenile criminal justice systems is that they can be canceled, which can still be carried out as long as no party submits a cancellation. This diversion effort is a manifestation of restorative justice which aims to avoid children from the judicial process. So when the diversion is successfully carried out and an agreement arises, it means that the goal of restorative justice has been achieved.

How to cite item: Endriyanti, M., Aprilianda, N., & Madjid, A. (2019). Implikasi Yuridis Penetapan Hakim Berkaitan Diversi yang Melanggar Ketentuan Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 10(1), 58-68. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v10i1.2947

Keywords

Juridical Implications, Determination of Judges, Divertion.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aprilianda, Nurini. 2017. Perlindungan Anak Korban Kekerasan Seksual melalui Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif. Jurnal Arena Hukum. Volume 10. Nomor 2.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).

Marlina. 2009. Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia: Pengembangan Konsep Diversi dan Restorative Justice. Bandung. Refika Aditama.

Mulyadi, Lilik. 2016. Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Surabaya. Bina Ilmu.

Packer. Herbert, L. 2011. The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. California. Stanford University Press.

Republik Indonesia. 2015. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 65 Tahun 2015 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Diversi dan Penanganan Anak yang Belum Berusia 12 (Dua Belas) Tahun. (Lembaran Negara Republik Indoneisa Nomor 194 Tahun 2015. Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5732).

Republik Indonesia. 1981. Undnag-Undang Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP). Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 76 Tahun 1981.

Republik Indonesia. 2012. Undnag-Undang Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 153 Tahun 2012. Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5332 Tahun 2012.

Rifai, Ahmad. 2010. Penemuan Hukum. Jakarta. Sinar Grafika.

Waluyo, Bambang. 2011. Viktimologi Perlindungan Korban dan Saksi. Jakarta. Sinar Grafika.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v10i1.2947