Kewenangan pejabat lelang kelas II terhadap minuta risalah lelang yang lebih batas waktu

Hartina Ruth Manora; Abdul Rachmad Budiono; Endang Sri Kawuryan

doi:10.26905/idjch.v13i1.7096

Kewenangan pejabat lelang kelas II terhadap minuta risalah lelang yang lebih batas waktu

Hartina Ruth Manora, Abdul Rachmad Budiono, Endang Sri Kawuryan

Abstract

This study aims to determine the position of the minutes of auction minutes after 30 years and the authority of the Auction Officer after the minutes are kept for 30 years. The Minutes of the Minutes of Auction Deed are authentic deeds and have perfect evidentiary power for the parties. In Article 92 paragraphs (3) and (4) of the Regulation of the Minister of Finance (PerMenKeu) Number 27/PMK.06/2016 concerning Auction Implementation Guidelines, it is stated that the minimum period of storage for the Minutes of Auction Deed is 30 years. The position of the minutes of auction minutes that have been kept for 30 years or more, if it is related to the juridical age of the authentic deed, then the position of the minutes of the auction minutes that have been kept for 30 years remains valid as legal evidence. Minutes of Auction made by the Class II Auction Officer are kept at the Class II Auction Officer's Office for 30 years so that the Class II Auction Officer is authorized to make a copy/quote/Grosse after 30 years and is not liable for the minutes of the auction minutes. In terms of enforcing the rights of the parties concerned and requiring the Minutes of Auction that have been kept for 30 years, the parties concerned may take legal action by submitting a request for a court order.

How to cite item:

Manora, H., Budiono, A., & Kawuryan, E. (2022). Kewenangan pejabat lelang kelas II terhadap minuta risalah lelang yang lebih batas waktu. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 13(1), 96-106. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i1.7096.

Keywords

Authority; Class II Tender Officials; Minutes of Auction.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Azmi. Modul 1: Pengelolaan Arsip Statis. http://www.pustaka.ut.ac.id/lib/.

Balai Lelang Harmoni. Asas-asas dalam Pelaksanaan lelang. https://www.balailelang.co.id/index.php/home/asas-asas-dalam-pelaksanaan-lelang.

Hadjon, PM. & Djatmiayi, S. 1997. Tentang Wewenang. Majalah Yuridika. Edisi V.

Hadjon, PM. 1998. Tentang Wewenang Pemerintahan, (Bestuurebevoegdheid). ProJustitia. Tahun XVI. Nomor 1. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Parahyangan. Bandung.

Bakhtiar, H.S., Sofyan, A.M., Muhadar, & Soewondo, S.S. 2019. The Essence of Autopsy In The Criminal Investigation Process. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8, 9-16.

Haris, M. 201). Kewenangan Notaris sebagai Pejabat Lelang Kelas II dalam Memberikan Penyuluhan Hukum atas Akta Risalah Lelang yang dibuatnya. Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran, 17(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.18592/sy.v17i1.1502.

Indroharto. 1996. Beberapa Pengertian Dasar Hukum Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Marbun, S.F. 2008. Peradilan Administrasi Negara dan Upaya Administratif di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Mertokusumo, S. 2013. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Liju, N., & Budiono, A. 2021. Perlindungan hukum terhadap pembeli lelang yang tidak menerima objek lelang dalam masa penyerahan. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 12(3), 303-313. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v12i3.7095.

Sianturi, PT. 2013. Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pembeli Barang Jaminan Tidak Bergerak Melalui Lelang. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Sugeng, B & Sujayani. 2015. Pengantar Hukum Acara Perdata & contoh Litigasi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i1.7096