Notary's Obligation to Provide Legal Services Free of Charge

Rosy Indrajaya

doi:10.26905/idjch.v14i1.8516

Notary's Obligation to Provide Legal Services Free of Charge

Rosy Indrajaya

Abstract

The problem in this study is related to the parameter of the phrase unable to fulfill the Notary's obligations regulated in the Notary Office Law and the form of legal protection. So that the goal of this writing is to get legal protection for Notaries against the ambiguity of legal norms. This study uses normative legal research methods with several approaches, namely the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that preventive legal protection can be provided through laws and regulations that explain the criteria/standards for underprivileged people, namely: livelihood, salary or wages, those who are only able to meet basic needs that are decent but unable to pay contributions for themselves and his family. The repressive legal protection that can be given to a Notary, in this case, is if the Notary is not sure about the financial condition of the apparel so that he cannot provide legal services in the notary field for free, then another form of providing legal services is in the form of a reduction in honorarium or notary fees. in making a deed, the amount of the notary's honorarium has been determined by the provisions of the law.

How to cite item: Indrajaya, Rosy, “Notary's Obligation to Provide Legal Services Free of Charge.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum14 no. 1 (2023): 106-114. DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v14i1.8516.

Keywords

Notaries; Appearers; Law Protection.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Buko, Siska Harun. “ANALISIS YURIDIS TENTANG KEWAJIBAN NOTARIS DALAM MEMBERIKAN JASANYA KEPADA MASYARAKAT YANG TIDAK MAMPU BERDASARKAN UU NO. 2 TAHUN 2014,” LEX PRIVATUM,” (February 17, 2017). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/15116.

Iryadi, Irfan. “Kedudukan Akta Otentik Dalam Hubungannya Dengan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara.” Jurnal Konstitusi 15, no. 4 (January 15, 2019): 796. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1546.

Manik, Florence Permenta Br. “ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PASAL 37 UUJN-P NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG JABATAN NOTARIS DAN KODE ETIK NOTARIS MENGENAI SANKSI BAGI NOTARIS YANG MENOLAK MEMBERIKAN JASA HUKUM SECARA CUMA-CUMA KEPADA ORANG YANG TIDAK MAMPU.” Recital Review 3, no. 1 (May 6, 2021): 89–105. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v3i1.10673.

Nur Irsan, Muhammad. “KEWAJIBAN NOTARIS MEMBERIKAN JASA HUKUM SECARA CUMA-CUMA KEPADA ORANG TIDAK MAMPU DI KOTA PANGKALPINANG.” Tesis, UNIVERSITAS SRIWIJAYA, (2021).

Puspita, Agritya Dinda. “Implementasi Pasal 37 Undang – Undang Jabatan Notaris Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Kewajiban Notaris Untuk Memberikan Jasa Hukum Secara Cuma – Cuma Di Kota Surakarta,” (September 29, 2022). https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/41476.

Rahman, Rizki Ryadika. “Penyelesaian Dugaan Pelanggaran Kode Etik Oleh Majelis Pengawas Notaris Terhadap Notaris Yang Telah Meninggal Dunia,” (October 1, 2022). https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/41579.

Sitorus, Jhon Yohannes Philip, “Kewajiban Pemberian Jasa Hukum Secara Cuma-Cuma Oleh Notaris Pada Orang Tidak Mampu.” Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 5, no. 3 (December 14, 2020): 446. https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2020.v05.i03.p02.

Sridana, Claudia Verena Maudy, and I Ketut Westra. “Kewajiban Pemberian Jasa Hukum Secara Cuma-Cuma Oleh Notaris Pada Orang Tidak Mampu.” Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 5, no. 3 (December 14, 2020): 446. https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2020.v05.i03.p02.

Sumaya, Pupu Sriwulan. “Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Tanggung Jawab Notaris,” (March 6, 2023). http://journal.unigres.ac.id/index.php/JurnalProHukum/article/view/2537.

W, Pebriana Putri Sukma, Djumardin Djumardin, and Muh. Risnain. “Pelaksanaan Kewajiban Notaris Memberikan Jasa Hukum Di Bidang Kenotariatan Secara Cuma-Cuma Kepada Orang Yang Tidak Mampu Di Kota Mataram (Studi Di Notaris Kota Mataram ).” Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan 4, no. 1 (April 3, 2023). https://doi.org/10.29303/risalahkenotariatan.v4i1.91.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v14i1.8516