Email this article 
The Significance of Computer Forensics in Electronic Documents as Evidence in Criminal Law
Abstract
Forensic science standards, no crime never leaves traces. Along with the emergence of cybercrime, a new type of evidence emerged as an expansion of conventional evidence in Indonesian criminal procedural law, namely electronic evidence as stated in the Law on Electronic Information or electronic documents whose authenticity can be guaranteed, but there is no further explanation. Further, what is the procedure for guaranteeing its authenticity? Based on this, not all electronic information or documents can be used as evidence. One branch of forensic science that is relevant to proving cybercrimes is computer forensics. The problem that arises is to what extent is the significance of computer forensics to guarantee electronic information or electronic documents as evidence. This article was based on legal research using a conceptual, statutory, and case approach. The result of this study is that computer forensics plays a significant role in the crime of illegal access to electronic devices because it is a tool in criminal procedural law that can be used to guarantee the authenticity of electronic information or electronic documents so that they can be accepted as evidence in court.
How to cite item: Hardinanto, Aris, Barda Nawawi Arief, and Joko Setiyono. “The Significance of Computer Forensics in Electronic Documents as Evidence in Criminal Law.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 14 no. 2 (2023):155-166. DOI: doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v14i2.10820.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmed, M., Islam, S.R., Anwar, A., Moustafa, N., Pathan, AS.K. (eds) “Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Cyber Security.” Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 1025. Springer, Cham. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96630-0_8.
Aisyah, N., Putra, A., Safrizal, S., Valentino, V., Zikriah, Z., Prasetyo, B., Susanti, D., & Nurhayati, N. “Analisa Perkembangan Digital Forensik Dalam Penyidikan Cybercrime di Indonesia Secara Systematic Review.” Jurnal Esensi Infokom: Jurnal Esensi Sistem Informasi Dan Sistem Komputer, 6(1), (2022): 22-27. https://doi.org/10.55886/infokom.v6i1.452.
Al Azhar, M.N., Standart Operating Procedure (SOP), DFAT Puslabfor Mabes Polri, 2010.
Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Pengkajian Hukum Tentang Masalah Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti Elektronik, Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 1998.
Berkas Perkara No. 1322/Pid.b/2004/PN.JKT.PST atas nama Dani Firmansyah.
Carr, Chris dan John Beaumont, Law of Evidence, London: Blackstone Press Limited, 1996.
Casey, Eoghan, Digital Evidence and Computer Crime: Forensic Science, Computers and The Internet, USA, Elsevier. Inc, 2011.
Darren Quick, Ben Martini, Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, “Forensic Collection of Cloud Storage Data: Does the Act of Collection Result in Changes to the Data or its Metadata?” Cloud Storage Forensics, Syngress, (2014): 153-174, ISBN 9780124199705, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-419970-5.00007-7.
Dudeja, V.D., Cyber Crimes, and Law, Crime in Cyber Space – Scams And Frauds Volume 1, New Delhi: Commonwealth, 2002.
Hassan, N.A “Introduction: Understanding Digital Forensics.” In: Digital Forensics Basics. Apress, Berkeley, CA. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-3838-7_1.
Hiariej, Eddy O.S., Teori & Hukum Pembuktian, Jakarta: Erlangga, 2012.
Hong Wu, Guan Zheng, “Electronic evidence in the blockchain era: New rules on authenticity and integrity,” Computer Law & Security Review, Volume 36, (2020), 105401, ISSN 0267-3649, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105401.
Kessler, Gary C., Judges Awareness, Understanding, and Application of Digital Evidence, (Longfellow Blvd, Lakeland: Southeastern University, 2010.
Laporan Komputer Forensik Perkara No. 1322/Pid.b/2004/PN.JKT.PST atas nama Dani Firmansyah.
Laporan Komputer Forensik Perkara No. 97/Pid.Sus/2011/PN.SLMN atas nama Andi Kurniawan alias Fandiekun.
Miller, Christa M., “A Survey of Prosecutors and Investigators Using Digital Evidence: A Starting Point,” Forensic Science International: Synergy 6 (January 1, 2023): 100296, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100296.
Moussa, A.F. “Electronic evidence and its authenticity in forensic evidence.” Egypt J Forensic Sci 11, 20 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-021-00234-6.
Panggabean, H.P., Hukum Pembuktian: Teori-Praktik dan Yurisprudensi di Indonesia, Bandung: Alumni, 2012.
Putra Jaya, Nyoman Serikat, Hukum dan Hukum Pidana di Bidang Ekonomi, Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2012.
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan No. 1488/Pid.B/2008/PN.Jkt.Sel atas nama H. Muchdi Purwopranjono
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan No. 1488/Pid.B/2008/PN.Jkt.Sel atas nama H. Muchdi Purwopranjono.
Satria, Hariman. “Ke Arah Pergeseran Beban Pembuktian”. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi 3 (1) (2018): 87-114. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v3i1.142.
Schafer, Burkhard, and Stephen Mason. “The Characteristics of Electronic Evidence.” In Electronic Evidence, edited by Stephen Mason and Daniel Seng, 4th ed., 18–35. University of London Press, (2017). http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv512x65.9.
Schafer, Burkhard, and Stephen Mason. “The Characteristics of Electronic Evidence.” In Electronic Evidence, edited by Stephen Mason and Daniel Seng, 4th ed., 18–35. University of London Press, (2017). http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv512x65.9.
Singh, J., Sharma, N.R. (eds) “Crime Scene Management within Forensic Science.” Springer, Singapore. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6683-4_11.
Suryokumoro, Herman, Ikaningtyas Ikaningtyas, “Perlindungan Terhadap Penduduk Sipil Pada Saat Terjadi Konflik Bersenjata Berdasarkan Hukum Humaniter Internasional dan Hukum Pertahanan Indonesia,” RechtIdee, Vol. 15, No. 2, (Desember 2020) 207-244, https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v15i2.8576.
Tosza, S. All evidence is equal, but electronic evidence is more equal than any other: The relationship between the European Investigation Order and the European Production Order. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 11(2), (2020): 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284420919802.
Trisha Soraya Assad,” PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP PENYEBARAN BERITA BOHONG (HOAX) DI MEDIA SOSIAL DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 19 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK,” Prosiding Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 2, (Agustus, 2019) http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/.v0i0.16325.
Ward, T. Explaining and trusting expert evidence: What is a ‘sufficiently reliable scientific basis’? The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 24(3), (2020): 233–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712720927622.
Weir, George R. S., and Stephen Mason. “The Sources of Electronic Evidence.” In Electronic Evidence, edited by Stephen Mason and Daniel Seng, 4th ed., University of London Press, (2017): 1–17. http://www.jstor
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v14i2.10820
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum |
