Beyond Retributive: Exploring the Participatory Paradigm in the Ferdi Sambo Trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v15i2.14530Keywords:
Retributive, Participatory Paradigm, Class a Criminal Case, Ferdi SamboAbstract
The participatory paradigm offers a different perspective on crime and justice. Instead of focusing solely on punishment, this paradigm emphasizes restoration, dialogue, and reconciliation. Applying the participatory paradigm could be a breakthrough in the context of high-profile criminal cases such as Ferdy Sambo, providing a more comprehensive and sustainable solution. The research problem in this study is that applying the participatory paradigm in the legal process of high-profile criminal cases like the Ferdi Sambo trial can shift the retributive approach within Indonesia's criminal justice system. It also explores the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the participatory paradigm in high-profile criminal cases like the Ferdi Sambo trial in Indonesia. The case of Ferdi Sambo, a police general in Indonesia involved in a murder scandal, sparked extensive debate and analysis regarding the participatory paradigm in the context of law enforcement and justice. In this context, the participatory paradigm involves various parties in decision-making and law enforcement processes. Implementing the participatory paradigm in science and legal philosophy has several advantages, such as enhancing inclusivity, transparency, and legitimacy by involving multiple stakeholders in knowledge production and legal processes. However, this approach also has drawbacks, including challenges in balancing public participation with the objectivity of the judicial process, potential conflicts of interest, and maintaining the integrity of the legal system.
References
Arief, Barda Nawawi. “Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana.” Prenada Media, 2016.
Braithwaite, John. “Restorative Justice & Responsive Regulation.” Oxford University Press, USA, 2002.
Chandra, Jessica., “View of Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Perempuan Pada Tindak Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga.” Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia,” n.d. https://jurnal.syntaxliterate.co.id/index.php/syntax-literate/article/view/13925/9147.
De Sousa Santos, Boaventura. Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization, and Emancipation.” Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. “The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research.” SAGE, 2005.
Fals-Borda, Orlando, and Muhammad Anisur Rahman. ”Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly with Participatory Action Research.” Intermediate Technology Publications, 1991.
Galanter, Marc. “Justice in Many Rooms: Courts, Private Ordering, and Indigenous Law.” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 13, no. 19 (January 1, 1981): 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1981.10756257.
Guba, Egon G., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. “Fourth Generation Evaluation.” SAGE, 1989.
Heron, John, and Peter Reason. “A Participatory Inquiry Paradigm.” Qualitative Inquiry 3, no. 3 (September 1, 1997): 274–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049700300302.
Ip, Ken Gee-kin. "Fulfilling the Mandate of National Reconciliation in the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) – An Evaluation through the Prism of Victims’ Rights", International Criminal Law Review 13, 4 (2013): 865-894, doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01304004.
James, Michael Rabinder “Multicultural Jurisdictions: Cultural Differences and Women’s Rights by Ayelet Shachar.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 41, no. 3 (January 23, 2008): 497–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2007.00564.x.
Kalsem, Kristin, 'Feminist Judging: Theories and Practices', in Deborah Brake, Martha Chamallas, and Verna L. Williams (eds), “The Oxford Handbook of Feminism and Law in the United States.” (2023) online edn, Oxford Academic, 9 June 2021), https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197519998.013.32.
Kemmis, Stephen, Robin McTaggart, and Rhonda Nixon. “A New View of Participation: Participation in Public Spheres.” In Springer eBooks, 33–49, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2_2.
Kirchengast, T., Badaró, T., & Pardini, L. (2021). ”The mixed and hybrid criminal courts of Brazil: Mainstreaming restoration, rehabilitation and community justice in a human rights context.” International Review of Victimology, 27(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758020916261.
Martinez-Vargas, Carmen, Melanie Walker, F. Melis Cin, and Alejandra Boni. 2021. “A Capabilitarian Participatory Paradigm: Methods, Methodologies and Cosmological Issues and Possibilities.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 23 (1): 8–29. doi:10.1080/19452829.2021.2013173.
Merry, Sally Engle. “Legal Pluralism.” Law & Society Review 22, no. 5 (January 1, 1988): 869–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638.
Ostrom, Elinor. “Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action.” Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Reyes-Torres, A., Portalés-Raga, M., Domene-Benito, R. (2024). Multiliteracies and Picturebooks: A Gender-Based Critical and Aesthetic Engagement with Social Justice Through a Nonfictional Heroine. In: Tavares, V. (eds) Empowering Language Learners in a Changing World through Pedagogies of Multiliteracies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51889-8_9.
Samekto, Adji. “Antara Studi Normatif dan Keilmuan.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif 2, no. 2 (July 18, 2011): 55. https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.2.2.55.
Scholz, Trebor, and Rachel Cobcroft. 2006. “Free: Acknowledgments:”. M/C Journal 9 (4). https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.2640.
Szymańska, Maria. 2022. “The Subject-Participatory Paradigm in Correlation With the Constitutive Features of Pedagogical Qualitative Research: A Personalistic Perspective”. Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education 11 (1 (21), 151-69. https://doi.org/10.35765/mjse.2022.1121.08.
Tjitra, Andry Triyanto, and Eko Ari Wibowo. “Hakim Sebut Replik Dalam Sidang Pleidoi Ferdy Sambo, Apa Maksudnya?” Tempo, January 25, 2023. https://www.tempo.co/hukum/hakim-sebut-replik-dalam-sidang-pleidoi-ferdy-sambo-apa-maksudnya--225815.
Wakeford, Tom, Jasber Singh, Bano Murtuja, Peter Bryant, and Michel Pimbert. “The SAGE Handbook of Action Research.” SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks, 2008. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607934.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.