BEYOND RETRIBUTIVE: EXPLORING THE PARTICIPATORY PARADIGM IN THE CLASS A CRIMINAL CASE - THE FERDI SAMBO TRIAL IN INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v15i2.14530Abstract
The participatory paradigm offers a different perspective on crime and justice. Instead of focusing solely on punishment, this paradigm emphasizes restoration, dialogue, and reconciliation. In the context of high-profile criminal cases such as that of Ferdy Sambo, the application of the participatory paradigm could be a breakthrough, providing a more comprehensive and sustainable solution. The research problem in this study on the application of the participatory paradigm in the legal process of high-profile criminal cases like the Ferdi Sambo trial can shift the retributive approach within Indonesia's criminal justice system. It also explores the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the participatory paradigm in high-profile criminal cases, such as the Ferdi Sambo trial in Indonesia. The case of Ferdi Sambo, a police general in Indonesia involved in a murder scandal, sparked extensive debate and analysis regarding the participatory paradigm in the context of law enforcement and justice. In this context, the participatory paradigm refers to involving various parties in decision-making and law enforcement processes. The implementation of the participatory paradigm in the philosophy of science and legal philosophy has several advantages, such as enhancing inclusivity, transparency, and legitimacy by involving multiple stakeholders in knowledge production and legal processes. However, this approach also has drawbacks, including challenges in balancing public participation with the objectivity of the judicial process, potential conflicts of interest, and maintaining the integrity of the legal system.
References
Adjie FX Samekto. “ Kajian Hukum: Antara Studi Normatif dan Keilmuan. .†Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 2006, 2–2.
Barda Arier Nawawi. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana:(Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru)., 2011.
Braithwaite, J. Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford University Press, 2002.
Fals-Borda, O., & Rahman, M. A. Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly with Participatory Action Research. . Apex Press, 1991.
Febri Angga Palguna. “Hakim Sebut Replik dalam Sidang Pleidoi Ferdy Sambo, Apa Maksudnya?†https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1683655/hakim-sebut-replik-dalam-sidang-pleidoi-ferdy-sambo-apa-maksudnya, t.t.
Galanter, M. “Justice in Many Rooms: Courts, Private Ordering, and Indigenous Law. .†. . The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, t.t., 17.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage Publications. Sage Publications, 1989.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage Publications, 1989.
Heron, J., & Reason, P. A Participatory Inquiry Paradigm. Qualitative Inquiry. Vol. 3, 1997.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. “Participatory Action Research: Communicative Action and the Public Sphere. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.),†567. Sage Publications, t.t.
Lincoln, Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Handbook of Qualitative Research, Terjemahan Dariyatno dkk. Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2009, 2009.
Meidianto A. D., & STK, S. I. K. (2021). Alternatif penyelesaian perkara kekerasan dalamrumah tangga: dalam perspektif mediasi penal, 2021.
Merry, S.E. “Legal Pluralism.†Law & Society Review 22, no. 5 (1988): 869–96.
Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press. , 1990.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. . Sage Publications, t.t.
———. Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. Sage Publications. , 2008.
Santos, B. de S. Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization, and Emancipation. Butterworths LexisNexis, 2002.
Shachar, A. Multicultural Jurisdictions: Cultural Differences and Women’s Rights. Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Shidarta, Shidarta. “SLIDES: Filsafat Hukum bagi Penstudi Program Doktor Hukum,†t.t. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28104.08968.
Sri Mamudji, et al. Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum. Jakarta: Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2005.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
