Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Fiktif Berdasarkan Hukum Positif Di Indonesia

Authors

  • Farid Ramdani Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v9i2.2763

Keywords:

Request, Decisions, Fictions.

Abstract

This study aims to examine the regulation of silence or pengabain by officials / administrative bodies of the state on requests for state administrative decisions (fictional KTUN). The regulation of the fictitious KTUN currently regulated in Law No. In 1986 concerning the State Administrative Court, Law No. 14 of 2014 concerning Government Administration and Supreme Court Regulation No. 7 of 2018 concerning Procedure Guidelines for Obtaining Decisions Upon Acceptance of Requests to Obtain Decisions and / or Actions by the Agency or Government Officials. The fictitious KTUN arrangements in the three regulations are mutually contradictory, giving rise to confusion in their application. This study attempts toexamine differences in settings, legal consequences and solutions to these differences. This study uses a type of normative research that is prescriptive in nature using a legislative approach and analytical approach. In the case of facing vague legal norms or unclear norms, the judge interprets the Law to find the law. Interpretation by the judge is an explanation that must lead to the implementation that is acceptable to the public regarding legal regulations against concrete events. The method of interpretation is a suggestion or tool to find out the meaning of the law.

How to cite item: Ramdani, F. (2018). Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Fiktif Berdasarkan Hukum Positif Di Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 9(2), 135-141. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v9i2.2763

 

References

Ðbdullаh, M. Ðli. 2015. Teori dаn Prаktek Hukum Ðcаrа Perаdilаn Tаtа Usаhа Negаrа Pаscа Ðmаndemen. Jаkаrtа, Kecаnа.

Ali, Achmad. 2002. Menguak Tabir Hukum (Suatu Kajian Filosofis dan Sosiologis). Jakarta. Toko Gunung Agung.

Hadjon, Philipus M dan Tatiek Sri Djatmiati. 2009. Argumentasi Hukum. Yogyakarta. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Hamidi, Jazim. 2006 Revolusi Hukum Indonesia: Makna, Kedudukan, dan Implikasi Hukum Naskah Proklamasi 17 Agustus 1945 dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan RI. Jakarta. Konstitusi Press.

Indrati, Maria Farida dan Soeprapto. 1998. Ilmu Perundang-undangan: Dasar-dasar dan Pembentukannya. Yogyakarta. Kanisius.

Marbun, SF. 2004. Dimensi-Dimensi Pemikiran Hukum Administrasi Negara. Yogyakarta. UII Press.

Mawardi, Irvan. 2016. Paradigma Baru PTUN Respon Peradilan Administrasi Terhadap Demokratisasi. Jogyakarta. Thafa Media.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno dan A. Pitlo. 1993. Bab-bab tentang Penemuan Hukum. Jakarta. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. 2002. Mengenal Hukum (Suatu Pengantar). Cet. III. Yogyakarta. Liberty.

Soebekhi, dkk. 2014. Bungа Rаmpаi Perаdilаn Ðdministrаsi Kontemporer. Yogyаkаrtа. Gentа Press.

Syahrani, Riduan. 1999. Rangkuman Intisari Ilmu Hukum. Bandung. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-01

How to Cite

Ramdani, Farid. 2018. “Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Fiktif Berdasarkan Hukum Positif Di Indonesia”. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 9 (2):135-41. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v9i2.2763.