Contradictory Impartiality Principle in the Supervisory System of Constitutional Court Judges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v10i2.3470Keywords:
Supervision, Nemo Judex Idoneus In Propria Causa Principle, Impartiality Principle.Abstract
The Constitutional Court (MK) through Its Verdict No. 1-2 / PUU-XII / 2014 substantially causes a legal vacuum (rechtsvacum) serving as the basis for the constitutional judge's external supervisory body. Besides that, with the application of the Constitutional Court's supervisory system through the Ethics Council and the Constitutional Court Honorary Council (MKMK) is considered to have deviated the principle of nemo judex idoneus in propria causa because one of the members of the MKMK was a constitutional judge, means hearing his own case. The research method used is the normative legal research method with the statue approach and conceptual approach. Supervision of Constitutional Court judges requires Reinventing (legal reform) by involving members of the Supreme Court and members of the House of Representatives as members of the Ethics Council and replacing one Constitutional Judge with one former Supreme Court Judge. The supervision change of the Constitutional Court judges is aimed to increase the authority of the Constitutional Court and to hold the principle of impartiality.
How to cite item: Prakosa, A., Alanda, P., Istianah, N., & Rohman, L. (2019). Contradictory Impartiality Principle in the Supervisory System of Constitutional Court Judges. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 10(2), 117-125. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v10i2.3470
ÂReferences
Ashar, Ahmad. 2009. Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial dalam Pengangkatan Hakim Agung Berdasarkan pada UU Nomor 22 Tahun 2004 tentang Komisi Yudisial, Jurnal DAHA, Vol. 1 No. 42, Januari 2009.
Fitri, Rahma. 2018. Pelanggaran Etik dan Hak Pribadi dalam Kasus Kode Etik di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal RechtsVinding, Maret 2018.
Ihsanuddin. 2013. 9 Alasan Majelis Kehormatan Berhentikan Akil Mochtar. https://kompas.com/nasional/read/2013/11/01/1244259/9.Alasan.Majelis.Kehormatan.Berhentikan.Akil.Mochtar. diakses pada tanggal 03 Nopember 2019.
Jailani, Sofyan. 2012. Independensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman Berdasar Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Fiat Justitia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 6 No. 3, September-Desember 2012.
Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar dan Arif Sidharta. 2000. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Suatu Pengenalan Pertama Ruang Lingkup Berlakunya Ilmu Hukum. Buku I. Bandung. Alumni.
Lumbun, Gayus. 2013. Tentang Pembaruan Pengadilan Khusus dalam Perspektif Mahkamah Agung, Bunga Rampai Komisi Yudisial. Jakarta. Komisi Yudisial.
Machmudin, Dudu Duswara. 2006. Peranan Keyakinan Hakim dalam Memutus suatu Perkara di Pengadilan. Jurnal Varia Peradilan MA RI, Vol. 25 No. 2, Oktober 2006.
Maladi, Yanis. 2010. Benturan Asas Nemo judex idoneus in propria causa dan Asas Ius Curia Novit (Telaah Yuridis putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 005/PUU-IV/2006). Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 7 No. 2, April 2010.
Malysz, Piotr J. 2007. Nemo iudex in causa sua as the Basis Of Law, Justice And Justifications In Luther’s Thought. HTR Harvard Divinity School, Vol. 100 No. 3, Juni 2007.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2012. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta. Prenamedia Group.
Muchlis. 2008. Hubungan Komisi Yudisial dengan Mahkamah Agung dalam Pengawasan Hakim. Jurnal Suloh, Vol. 6 No. 2, September 2008.
Muhtadi. 2015. Problematika Yuridis Sistem Alokasi Hukum dalam Pengawasan Hakim. Fiat Justitia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 9 No. 2.
Santosa, Mas Achmad. 2007. Perspektif Fungsi Pengawasan Komisi Yudisial Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) Nomor 005/PUU-IV/2006. Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 1 No. 2, Desember 2007.
Simabura, Charles. 2009. Membangun Sinergis dalam Pengawasan Hakim. Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 7 No. 2, Juli 2009.
Sutiyoso, Bambang. 2011. Penguatan Peran Komisi Yudisial dalam Penegakan Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 18 No. 2, April 2011.
Syahayani, Zihan. 2014. Pembaharuan Hukum dalam Sistem Seleksi dan Pengawasan Hakim Konstitusi. Malang. Universitas Brawijaya.
Tutik, Titik Triwulan. 2012. Pengawasan hakim konstitusi dalam Sistem Pengawasan Hakim menurut Undang-Undang Dasar Negara RI 1945. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol. 12 No. 2, Mei 2012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
