Email this article 
The Principle of Reversing the Burden of Proof in Money Laundering Crimes
Abstract
This article analyzes the principle of reversal of the burden of proof adopted in Article 77 and Article 78 of the Law. The purpose is to explain related to the principle of presumption of innocence (presumption of innocence), which has been adopted in Article 66 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The normative legal research method examines authoritative texts as primary legal material and academic works as secondary legal material. The principle of reversal of the burden of proof in money laundering does not contradict the principle of presumption of innocence. On the contrary, the TPPU Law has placed defendants with legal subjects who deserve respect for their human rights to explain the origin of their assets not obtained from the proceeds of crime. The inability to explain the origin of the property does not make him guilty and criminalized. Because the Public Prosecutor is still obliged to prove his charges.
How to cite item: Amrullah, M. Arief. “The Principle of Reversing the Burden of Proof in Money Laundering Crimes.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 14 no. 2 (2023): 146-154. DOI: doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v14i2.10813.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akbar, Mochammad Fahd. “SISTEM PEMBALIKAN BEBAN PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG DITINJAU DARI ASAS HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA,” (2019). https://ejournal.unhasy.ac.id/index.php/irtifaq/article/view/623.
Amrullah, M. Arief. “The Potential of Money Laundering in the Regent Election in Indonesia.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 13, no. 3 (December 28, 2022): 231–41. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i3.8856.
Amrullah, M. Arief. Tindak pidana pencucian uang dalam perspektif kejahatan terorganisasi: pencegahan dan pemberantasannya. Jakarta: Kencana, 2020.
Arnone, Marco, and Leonardo S. Borlini. “International Anti‐money Laundering Programs.” Journal of Money Laundering Control 13, no. 3 (July 20, 2010): 226–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/13685201011057136.
Attorney-General’s Department. “Presumption of Innocence,” n.d. https://www.ag.gov.au/rights-and-protections/human-rights-and-anti-discrimination/human-rights-scrutiny/public-sector-guidance-sheets/presumption-innocence#what-is-the-presumption-of-innocence.
Azizah, Hanifah Fitria, Muhammad Hamdan, Mahmud Mulyadi, and Sunarmi Sunarmi. “Analisis Pembuktian Terbalik Pada Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Studi Putusan MA NO. 1454 K/PID.SUS/2011; PUTUSAN MA NO. 537 K/PID.SUS/2014; PUTUSAN MA NO. 336 K/PID.SUS/2015).” Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences 4, no. 1 (June 24, 2021): 80–87. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v4i1.588.
Badan Pusat Statistik, “Badan Pusat Statistik,” n.d. https://www.bps.go.id/subject/11/produk-domestik-bruto--lapangan-usaha-.html.
Council of Europe. “Burden of Proof Should Be Reversed to Allow Confiscations in Serious Offences: Warsaw Convention Report.” Criminal of the Parties to CETS 198, (June 30, 2021). https://www.coe.int/en/web/cop198/-/burden-of-proof-should-be-reversed-to-allow-confiscations-in-serious-offences-warsaw-convention-report.
Financial Action Task Force, Groupe d’action financière, “The 40 Recommendations, Published (October 2004),” n.d. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/The40recommendationspublishedoctober2004.html.
Hulu, Severius, Diantota Simanjuntak, Josua O.I Limbong, and Mesias Jusly Penus Sagala. “PENERAPAN SISTEM PEMBUKTIAN TERBALIK DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG.” Jurnal Darma Agung 27, no. 1 (April 4, 2019): 822. https://doi.org/10.46930/ojsuda.v27i1.138.
Husein, Yunus. Negeri Sang Pencuci Uang. Jakarta: Pustaka Juanda Tigalima, 2008.
Lubis, Fauziah, and Nasrullah Hidayat. “Penerapan Pembuktian Terbalik Dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Di Kota Medan.” Jurnal Mercatoria 14, no. 2 (December 29, 2021): 34–39. https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v14i2.5554.
Mulyadi, Lilik. “ASAS PEMBALIKAN BEBAN PEMBUKTIAN TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM SISTEM HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN KONVENSI PERSERIKATAN BANGSA-BANGSA ANTI KORUPSI 2003.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 4, no. 1 (March 31, 2015): 101. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.4.1.2015.101-132.
Nahuddin, Yusuf Eko. “PEMBUKTIAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM LINGKUNGAN.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, December 31, 2016. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v7i2.1944.
Pound, Roscoe. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1930.
Sagita, Afrianto. “Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Sebagai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Hukum Respublica 17, no. 1 (November 11, 2017): 21–43. https://doi.org/10.31849/respublica.v17i1.1449.
Satrya, Alda, Bastianto Nugroho, and Supolo Supolo. “Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Terhadap Perjudian Online.” Al-Manhaj : Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 4, no. 2 (October 6, 2022): 287–96. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v4i2.1863.
Tiwari, Milind, Adrian Gepp, and Kuldeep Kumar. “A Review of Money Laundering Literature: The State of Research in Key Areas.” Pacific Accounting Review 32, no. 2 (March 20, 2020): 271–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/par-06-2019-0065.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. “Estimating Illicit Financial Flows Resulting from Drug Trafficking and Other Transnational Organized Crimes. Research Report. Drugs and Alcohol,” n.d. https://www.drugsandalcohol.ie/16151.
Wibowo, Muhtar Hadi. “Corporate Responsibility in Money Laundering Crime (Perspective Criminal Law Policy in Crime of Corruption in Indonesia).” JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) 3, no. 2 (December 9, 2018): 213–36. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v3i02.22740.
Zabyelina, Yuliya. “Reverse Money Laundering in Russia: Clean Cash for Dirty Ends.” Journal of Money Laundering Control 18, no. 2 (May 5, 2015): 202–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmlc-10-2014-0039.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v14i2.10813
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum |
