Peer Review Process
The research article submitted to this online Journal will be peer-reviewed by at least 2 (two) reviewers. The accepted research articles will be available online following the Journal's peer-reviewing process. The language used in this Journal is English.
Review Guidelines
General
- Give a mark on the wrong part or the part that needs to be changed
- Give a mark on the right side of the wrong line or the line that needs to be changed
Details
- Title: Effectiveness, Specification, and clarity
- Abstract: Complete and describe the essence of the article
- Keywords: Describe the essential concept of the article
- Introduction: Up-to-date, originality, relevance of the Topic, compatibility of the critical reason for the research object, research gap(s), and novelty
- Research Method: Has to emphasize procedure and data analysis for empirical study
- Result: Analysis accuracy
- Findings: Up-to-date findings, relevance to the interrelated researchers, and the scientific contribution effect of finding /idea to the development of science
- Conclusion: Logical, valid, brief, and clear
- Suggestion: For practical action, development of new theory, and next/advanced research
- Picture/Table: Centered, not cut, Good quality to view, Picture/table title, referred to with a capital letter
- Bibliography: The degree of up-to-date and the reference to primary book sources. Rules: minimum of 80% of the journals or the interrelated scientific researchers above 2019 (year); the number of book sources is a minimum of 10; minimum of 80% in the text/material of art.
Complete the Review Process of the Manuscript
- Writing: Is the manuscript easy to follow, that is, has a logical progression and evident organization?
- Is the manuscript concise and understandable? Any parts that should be reduced,
- Eliminated/expanded/added?
- Note if there are significant problems with mechanics: grammar, punctuation, and spelling. (If just a few places are worded well or correctly, make a note to tell the author the specific areas. If there are consistent problems throughout, only select an example or two. Don't try and edit the whole thing).
- Abbreviations: Used judiciously and composed so the reader won't have trouble remembering what an abbreviation represents.
- Follows style, format, and other rules of the Journal.
- Citations are provided when providing evidence-based information from outside sources.
Categories Decision
- Publish: No Need Revision
- Minor: Revision can be done by the Editor-In-Chief or those who help
- Major: Revision can only be done by the author
- Rejected: Unproperly scientific or too many
